Should the Ottawa Senators Look at Acquiring Jeff Carter?
When the NHL All-Star weekend wraps up Sunday night at Scotiabank Place, the Ottawa Senators will be facing the last 30 games of their season. They currently sit sixth in the Eastern Conference with 60 points. Toronto, Florida and New Jersey are all five points back of the Sens. However, Florida and Jersey have four games in hand and Toronto has three.
The moral of the story is the Sens are a serious bubble team at this point. This has many fans almost giddy that a team that experts picked to be in the basement has a fighting chance of making the playoffs, but it creates quite the situation for Bryan Murray and the rest of management come February 27th.
If the Sens are one of the eight teams coming out of the East, do they have enough to compete with the Rangers or Bruins? Should management alter the "rebuilding" plan they put in place this time last year? Should they be content to get one round of playoff experience for their young team and keep the current line up? Should they move forward with last year's plan and move players that are vital to making the playoffs such as Filip Kuba?
Most fans hope for some sort of middle ground. To acquire a player that isn't an old, UFA rental for a prospect or a pick. Instead, many fans are hoping that Bryan Murray can swing a deal for a relatively young, productive player that has a reasonable contract without mortgaging the future.
Essentially, we want a miracle. Not only are very few players such as the one described above available, but the players that ARE will be sought after by 29 teams in the league, driving up the price.
We have heard many of the names. Bobby Ryan. Sam Gagner. Others like Ryan Suter and Zach Parise fit the bill but are not under contract for next season.
We have also heard the price for these players (Gagner excluded): Mika Zibanejad, First round pick, etc, etc. This scares fans. However, to get in this league, you have to give, and sometimes gambles are needed.
Last night however, Darren Dreger put another name out there; Jeff Carter. Recently acquired by Columbus only to have a nightmare season, Jeff Carter is apparently being shopped around the league. My suggestion is that he would be a player VERY worth looking at as a possible player to put the Sens in a position to succeed down the stretch.
Jeff Carter was the Flyers 11th overall pick in that legendary 2003 draft class. He is a three-time 30 goal scorer, and had a career high 46 in 08-09. He can play centre, but many of his more productive seasons have been on the wing. Does he have a long contract? Yes. Have there been some off-ice issues? Double yes. However, the fact is there is a hole in Ottawa's top six forward group. Currently the Sens ice one of two combinations:
Colin Greening - Jason Spezza - Milan Michalek
Erik Condra - Kyle Turris - Daniel Alfredsson
Or
Colin Greening - Jason Spezza - Bobby Butler
Milan Michalek - Kyle Turris - Daniel Alfredsson
The weak points are obviously Butler and Condra. Both are good players, neither has played in such a way that they ought to be in the top six. This creates a scenario where both the Spezza line and the Turris line NEED Michalek, and yet, we only have one Milo.
As stated above, this team has needs: A bottom pairing d-man better than Carkner and Lee, a back up goalie, and most importantly, a scoring top six guy. Carter is available, 27 years old, capable and under contract. It is a long contract, but 5.7 million for a team with oodles of cap room is not the end of the world for a top line player.
Columbus gave a first rounder (seventh overall), third rounder and Jakob Voracek. Would a package of Foligno, the Sens first rounder (hopefully ~18-22 or so) and a fourth do it? In my opinion, worth a look from Bryan Murray.
What are your thoughts? Should the Sens stay away? Should they go after Carter? Should they go after another player?
68 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Absolutely
Proven goal scorer, good size, good cap hit. As you pointed out so well, there is a hole in our top six. A 27 year proven scorer is something that should be at least looked at. And let’s face it, with all our kids coming, there some roster players that can be given up, Foligno a good example.
As for the attitude, I think almost every young player goes through it, going to parties and clubs. That’s no secret. In a market like Philly, it gets blown out of proportion.
by I Still Miss Hossa!!! on Jan 30, 2012 7:12 AM EST reply actions
With Spezza locking down the #1 C role I don’t understand how Carter fits the bill for “rounding out” the top 6.
The Sens also recently acquired a young Turris. Is he not working out?
Quality Wingers are much easier to get and they don’t have 10 year contracts on 5.27 hits. Carter is a C who can play Wing but I doubt the Jackets give him away although surely a bargain can be had.
I don’t see the Sens as being one going hard for Carter but they can probably check in on price but what are the Jackets real needs? A young G with starter potential and young puck moving D, a first rounder is a given in a Carter deal.
Does Foligno really fit the Jacket’s wish list? We’ll find out soon enough because if Carter isn’t moved by the deadline he will be on fire sale prices this off-season, once his NTC kicks in the Jackets won’t even have control of his destination…
Shades of Heatley for them if they don’t move him and if the Sens get him and it doesn’t pan out they won’t be able to move him without his ok.
Consider contributing to Wiki if you can. It has come a long way since its inception in quality and its founders have resisted attempts to commercialize it. Lets keep it alive with a few dollars each.
Blockbuster potential
From Columbus’ point of view dealing with us makes alot of sens. A package of offensive potential and a first round pick in return for Carter is IMO what they need.
But since when can Columbus management ever be accused of knowing what it is doing?
From a Sens point of view what is a big physical center (27 years old) who has averaged 36 goals and 30 assists the last 4 years before this one worth? Would he fit as a 1 and 1a with Spezza or would there be ego issues? Spezza seems to be relishing his role, and this has become his team.
On the other hand, there is no such thing as having too many great centers, because the good ones are hockey players first, so they can play on the wing. This move would solve the problem of whenever Alfy decides to hang it up because we have lots of right-handed shot players… Turris… Z’jad…
Carter has a NTC and is signed until 2022 at $5.2 mill. Also is whatever got him traded out of Phily resolved or is he just a wild man waiting for a party to happen? Having anyone under contract for 10 years is risky. It doesn’t bode too well that bringing Carter into Columbus didn’t have much impact on them in the win / loss column. We’d need to do our homework to figure out if he’d fit into this dressing room or not.
This trade would be the biggest blockbuster in our history. It’s certainly worth discussing to find out what they would want in return.
This trade would be the biggest blockbuster in our history.
Seriously?
Alexei Yashin to New York Islanders for Zdeno Chara, F Bill Muckalt, and their 2001 first round (second overall) draft pick who turned out to be Jason Spezza. (Serious Ottawa win) – I’m not even a Sens fan but I am not sure how anyone can top that trade. Yashin for Chara and Spezza – EPIC TRADE
Consider contributing to Wiki if you can. It has come a long way since its inception in quality and its founders have resisted attempts to commercialize it. Lets keep it alive with a few dollars each.
Pretty sure Heatley for Hossa is bigger than this would be, too
Rundblad and a second for Turris could arguably be bigger, too.
Silver Seven | Twitter | Facebook | E-mail | eBay
by Peter Raaymakers on Jan 30, 2012 8:50 PM EST up reply actions
Terrible idea
Too much money for too many years for too high a price. Stay the course.
Shrubberies are my trade. I am a shrubber. My name is Roger the Shrubber. I arrange, design, and sell shrubberies.
by RogerTheShrubber on Jan 30, 2012 8:02 AM EST reply actions
for this reason.
Ottawa isnt ready for a contracts like these.
by AAZZ on Jan 30, 2012 8:30 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
that's fair
but for that reason, in my opinion, he could be had for less than someone like Bobby Ryan.
Exactly
The benefit in targeting Carter is that you’d be buying low: There aren’t many suitors for a nine-year contract, especially with a cap hit that’s still over $5M per season, he’s had question marks surrounding him for a while, and he hasn’t been great this season.
Virtually every argument against acquiring Carter suggests that the price to acquire him will be lower, and therefore the incentive in acquiring him will be higher. That doesn’t mean it will make sense to trade for him, necessarily, but it does mean that it’s not cut-and-dry.
Silver Seven | Twitter | Facebook | E-mail | eBay
by Peter Raaymakers on Jan 30, 2012 9:46 AM EST up reply actions
which is why I wrote this article
because I think its an interesting question. I don’t think we could get a player of his caliber for the price that he could be moved for.
To clarify, it's a good article, and a question worth asking...
…since the talk is out there. So don’t take this as a criticism of your article, but rather of the idea of acquiring a huge contract like this.
But the answer to the question has to be an emphatic no.
As Melnyk said last week, the team’s policy of not giving 10 year front-loaded contracts has paid dividends over the years.
Shrubberies are my trade. I am a shrubber. My name is Roger the Shrubber. I arrange, design, and sell shrubberies.
by RogerTheShrubber on Jan 30, 2012 10:04 AM EST up reply actions
no criticism taken my friend!
I’m not 100% sold on the idea myself. I just think its an interesting idea. The contract length is awful though, so in the end, the answer may be no.
I think the issue with this contract is the fact it wasn’t frontloaded. It’s actually loaded in the middle, so if the Sens wanted to take it on they’d be taking the brunt of the payments on this contract.
by modsuperstar on Jan 30, 2012 5:43 PM EST up reply actions
I'm torn on this one...
On one hand, a 27-year-old scoring centre/winger would look pretty good on this roster right about now. On the other hand, that is a scary contract to bite into. Not dollar-wise, because I don’t see the cap hit as a problem with our payroll… but 10 years? Yikes!
I think Carter needs a hockey market to really thrive… I mean, look at his numbers in Columbus, when compared to his numbers in Philly. Ottawa IS a hockey market, and it seems like players want to be here. (see Turris)
One question that I’m sure someone on here will know the answer to: Does his NTC last the entire length of his contract? That’s the only thing that worries me about it. I’m reluctant to sign anyone to ten years, but if we can get out from under it in four or five years, then it might not be so bad.
He’s young enough to fit in with our current plans, yet old enough and experienced enough to deal with media in a hockey market, and how to help the younger guys.
I’d say go for it, if BM can swing it. I’m not TOO worried about the first rounder… Carter makes an immediate impact (hopefully) whereas the first round kid won’t be ready for three or four years. So the trade (right away) looks like Foligno for Carter, and that, my friends is a no-brainer.
ALFIE! ALFIE! ALFIE!
I believe the NTC is full for 3 or 4 years
and then partial for the rest of it. but don’t quote me.
No harm
It doesn’t hurt to kick the tires (as BM puts it) and find out if they are interested and what they would want. Then we are in a position to see if it’s worth the risk or not.
Signing a guy to a lifetime contract like that and then even entertaining letting him go shortly afterwards would smell of something bad. If he “needs a hockey market” to thrive, that smells bad too… personality issues is not what we need to inject into this team that is on the rise… there’s work to be done, because 10 years is a long time to have a Yashin-like contract hanging around the neck of any organization (as the Islanders found out).
And there is no harm in kicking the tires.
I'm not saying he NEEDS a hockey market to thrive...
But there are guys out there who do well under pressure. And nothing brings pressure like playing in a hockey-mad market, like Ottawa or Philly… except maybe the playoffs, which we’re hoping for anyway.
ALFIE! ALFIE! ALFIE!
Carter needs booze to thrive...
Plenty of that in Ottawa but not sure how the locals and the media are going to react to him bar-hopping and then screwing the pooch most of the year. Remember when Ray-Ray was running around partying nonstop? It became a circus and eventally helped fracture the team.
Plus he’s got a 10-year deal…that alone would make me want to say no, let alone run him out of town at the earliest opportunity. Let Columbus deal with that guy, this team has good chemistry right now and doesn’t need much outside help.
by Quizzical Quorum on Jan 30, 2012 11:12 AM EST up reply actions
I'm not a fan.
I’m always wary of giving up a first round pick, but that’s the asking price. I would sooner wait for the off season, make an offer on Parise and keep the first rounder than go for Carter to be honest. But there’s probably a good reason why I’m not the GM of an NHL team.
Now if you could package some of our guys ie two of Foligno, Butler, Winchester, Regin and a late pick, I’d be okay with that. But there’s no reason why Columbus would take that deal.
Me neither
Howsan will be looking to try to save his ass, so if they decide to deal Carter, it’ll be for a king’s ransom… multiple picks and multiple prospects.
I’m almost never in favour of giving up a first rounder, as teams that deal their first rounders generally end up with Cap issues long before they have a good enough team to get deep into the playoffs (like the Leafs).
This team is scoring enough goals to win games, and Z’jad and Silfverberg are on the way and maybe even Stone… so we’re just going to get better offensively.
A couple of moves on the defensive side of things, and we could vault ourselves into the elite team category. Easier said than done… yes.
Moving Richards in here would be tantamount to blowing it all up offensively, which would be understandable if we were in trouble scoring goals… and we’re not.
If it weren't for the contract length...
…then I would definitely want him. The cap-hit is fine, the player is fine, it’s that length. In a way, we dodged the bullet with Heatley since he demanded a trade just as his most productive years were coming to an end. I know that Carter’s skill-set is a little different, and that he will likely be more productive for a longer period of time, but I still don’t like taking on a guy for that long.
No, no no...
If Ottawa was at the bottom like everyone predicted they would be, would we even be considering this? I think not…!
Let’s stay the course on rebuilding and see where the season (and post-season) takes us.
Besides NO PLAYER is worth a 10-year contract IMO!!
Isn't this dangerous?
If the Sens were not having such an outstanding year, but were, say, 4-5 points out of playoff position, everyone would freak at the possibility of giving up any piece of the “future” for a player (like Carter and otherwise).
If you can get Carter without giving up ANYTHING like Zibanejad, Stone, a 1st Rounder this year then, sure, do it. It has to be a steal (which it likley won’t be).
But having Carter this year doesn’t make us better than the Rangers and Bruins in my opinion.
Going for deal like this to squeak into the playoffs and likely lose in first round is foolhardy.
I’d sooner add an FA in the off-season than give up assets.
"Subdue the enemy without fighting" ~ Sun Tzu
yes.
very dangerous. However, even though its just one player, sometimes the right one player (not saying it IS carter) makes the difference. would carter make us better than the rangers? I don’t know.
but I do know that the rangers finished 8th last season, and by getting the RIGHT one player (richards) they are now being talked about as a team to beat. Just food for thought!
in regards to going after a free agent without giving up assets, I agree, thats a better course of action. However that rests on a player wanting to come to ottawa over 29 other teams. But more importantly, if we think we can sign parise (for example) to a contract with either a lower cap hit or shorter term than the carter deal, than I think we are dreaming.
All true.
So develop your own talent.
Hard to keep the rebuild going when you trade away your 1st and 2nd overall draft picks…
Shrubberies are my trade. I am a shrubber. My name is Roger the Shrubber. I arrange, design, and sell shrubberies.
by RogerTheShrubber on Jan 30, 2012 10:33 AM EST up reply actions
NO
Carter was shipped out from Philly because they couldn’t get over the hump with him as the centerpieces of a formidable offense. It’s one thing to reach for a player in free agency, it’s another thing to give up multiple good draft pics, a contributing veteran and cap flexibility for the next decade for a maybe gets us into the second round piece.
Foligno is gangbusters on the Sens third line and is being paid 20% of Carter’s salary with at least one more controllable RFA year.
Columbus only took Carter’s contract because they can’t attract marquis free agents at reasonable cap hits…Murray should be harping on the fact that Columbus won’t be able to compete before Nash becomes a free agent. If the Sens would consider giving up a holy trinity of hockey assets, they need to look at elite pieces like Nash.
His contract is a double edged sword.
Consistent 35-40 goal scorers don’t come around often, Murray should at least find out what the potentially price is.
Alfie may play one more season, so we’ll need veteran presence and scoring after Alfie for the upcoming young players. Is he a gamble? Of course. If his is not, Richards won’t be worth having or discussing.
Is Carter at 5.2 for 10 years a good deal in itself?
This is the bedrock question. Is Carter’s contract a friendly contract? Or an unfriendly contract? Not obvious either way, IMHO. But compensation must flow from that, as cap space is more inelastic than talented 1a centres. If on the open market an analogous player, like Parise, would cost us, say, 6-6.5 million for 4-5 years, then there is no way that I’d consider a straight-up Carter for Foligno trade an obviously good one, as Foligno is cheapish for his production and Carter is only slightly so. So why give up a Foligno for the chance to pay a bit less for that type of player, at the cost of being caught in a scary contact?
Carter is probably worth getting, but not at any price Columbus will consider, unless we really think he could put the Sens over the top this year.
Just looking at the salary cap numbers Carter is 63rd overall as far as his cap number. And according to Yahoo, the last 2 years his productions has left him 32nd and 12th ranked overall in the league. Not to say he’s underpaid, but his cap number has been worthwhile given he’s producing at a level that exceeds his contract rank.
by modsuperstar on Jan 30, 2012 5:58 PM EST up reply actions
Yes, I'd agree
This sounds like a good way to think of it. His cap is fine. The term would make it scary for some and not for others.
Alfy isn't suffering with Turris
There is no such thing as a friendly 10 year contract. That is a lifetime for a franchise.
But you know what? I like this conversation. It shows that we know something about this game that we’re not all frothing at the mouth wanting this guy. Just adding another offensive guy may not make us better. When I watch this team, that’s not the place we are wanting.
In the end if Richards is fueled by alcohol, or if he’s bad in the dressing room, that wouldn’t be too hard to figure out. It’s certainly a red flag that the Flyers chose to make place for Giroux by dealing him. Are the Flyers any better now. With Coutourier, I think so… We’ll see if they are playoff better.
I just like our team offensively. What’s wrong with Turris as the second line center for now, and we’ll see next year if Z’jad is ready or not. Alfy doesn’t seem to be suffering with Turris as his center.
Good Point
10 years is a long time. Go after Suter?
by I Still Miss Hossa!!! on Jan 30, 2012 12:01 PM EST up reply actions
Exactly.
We have some decent centre depth, and a lot of good wing prospects right now. No sense selling low. Let this team go as far as they can, let the new guys in to replace others, and trade spare parts as required for better pieces.
Give it another year. I think next year we might be more serious buyers at the deadline.
by The Tif on Jan 30, 2012 12:10 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
No way
Too much risk. As I have stated before, I am all about adding at the deadline but hit plus cancer risk, locker room that is, is too high on this one. We need an expiring contract at the deadline. One that we can option into a new contract or cast off at year end. I hate the idea of giving up Foligno. He is blossoming into a more crash and bang version of C. Kelly who can play on lines from top to bottom.
Do not forget the last time we dealt with Columbus
Vermette for Leclaire. Goalie of the future. Anyone remember?
A Goal Horn Haiku
Hoooonk hoooonk honk honk hooooonk
That's the sound the train horn makes
Suck it, Toronto
Fleecing?...Really
Until Lehner proves anything at the NHL level, I would hold off on any proclamation about who won that trade.
I was being obtuse.
Nightbreak was referring to Leclaire being the goalie of the future, and I was deliberately misinterpreting that comment to be Lehner.
Honestly, I'd forgotten that we'd gotten that pick as well
But Leclaire was supposed to be a young, hot goalie in his own right. The only thing that ended up being hot on him was the electric blanket he needed so his toes wouldn’t fall off from frostbite in the net.
A Goal Horn Haiku
Hoooonk hoooonk honk honk hooooonk
That's the sound the train horn makes
Suck it, Toronto
BM could make a case that we’re the ones that got fleeced. Vermette turned out OK for them whereas Leclaire… well, we won’t dredge that up.
What we did with Leclaire had nothing to do with Columbus.
That's what I'm saying.
Oh, neither the Sens nor the Jackets had anything to do with Leclaire being made of spun sugar. But the point is, what did they know; what did we know? Same goes for Carter. What do they know; what do we know?
A Goal Horn Haiku
Hoooonk hoooonk honk honk hooooonk
That's the sound the train horn makes
Suck it, Toronto
Vermette lit it up in his first full season, but it looks to have been all down hill from there. Sure Columbus is bad, but he’s a first line centre now who puts up less than .5 ppg. That’s 3rd liner output, exactly what he was when we gave him up to Columbus.
by modsuperstar on Jan 30, 2012 6:12 PM EST up reply actions
'Reply,' Marv
You know how that function works by now!
Silver Seven | Twitter | Facebook | E-mail | eBay
by Peter Raaymakers on Jan 30, 2012 1:05 PM EST up reply actions
There is something about a long term contract for a player that I haven’t seen much that scares me.
I am not against long term deals in general, just for these kinds.
I love soft players (especially Europeans) that play on the perimeter. Enigmas are awesome. Grit and heart-and-soul are red flags.
Erik Karlsson is better than your favourite player.
Twitter: @sens_adnan
Pretty much. :P
I am scared of the unknown for such a long term!
I love soft players (especially Europeans) that play on the perimeter. Enigmas are awesome. Grit and heart-and-soul are red flags.
Erik Karlsson is better than your favourite player.
Twitter: @sens_adnan
“Well, I don’t get a lot of opportunities to watch the Ducks play, but I really like Hagman’s game in NHL ’12, so, I approve.”
-Adnan, Ottawa Senators GM
by dzuunmod on Jan 30, 2012 8:20 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
The length of the deal is scary, but the cap hit isn’t. For one thing, $5M six, seven or eight years from now is not going to seem crazy at all. It may even be a steal. Secondly, with CBA negotiations, and the possibility (however slight) that there might be another salary rollback, Carter could be locked into a deal playing him closer to $4M for a decade. Some GM is going to jump at that. Lastly, Ottawa is going to be in the market for another scoring / two-way forward in a year when Alfie retires, and there aren’t any young players ready to step into that void.
I just think it’s hilarious that Columbus is shopping him now, when his value is lowest. Buy high, sell low, right? What a terrible franchise.
by Varada on Jan 30, 2012 1:44 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Short of saying something obvious,
the length will not be scary if he scores 30-35 goals per season
by whatsinaname on Jan 30, 2012 3:34 PM EST up reply actions
I think Montreal will overpay for him if he's available.
Reading the comments that Gautier is looking for a centre, and this the kind of deal he needs to do to keep his job.
Filatov, Zibanajad and yes, Foligno fit that spot
I am going on yet another Filatov rant here… no I am not, but he might have a future on 2nd line wing.
Zibanejad will want that spot next season and Senators will give it to him, with Alfie staying one more season, there is just no need to do anything there.
Why Foligno is not good enough?
Murray should pull a trigger on Carter if he is available as long as we do not ship the future, Foligno and 1st is ok, but will not be enough. Carter is a big question mark too. I vote stay the course and let guys play their way out/into the roster.
I know that, that doesn't matter, I know you Mr. Rainey, that's what matters. You stole my story.
Carter is better than Filatov and Foligno
And he’s definitely better than Zibanejad right now, and might be better than Zibanejad will ever be.
The problem with banking on prospects to become 30-goal scorers is that you’re counting your chickens well before they’ve hatched. Foligno has never had a 20-goal season; Carter has had a 46-goal season, and two 30-plus-goal seasons. Filatov has 14 NHL points.
A team can’t really count on “might have a future as” throughout the lineup.
Silver Seven | Twitter | Facebook | E-mail | eBay
by Peter Raaymakers on Jan 30, 2012 3:54 PM EST up reply actions
Is he?
Or was he a product of the Philly system?
His production for Columbus may indicate the latter. It can’t be ruled out.
Shrubberies are my trade. I am a shrubber. My name is Roger the Shrubber. I arrange, design, and sell shrubberies.
by RogerTheShrubber on Jan 30, 2012 4:26 PM EST up reply actions
I can’t see how he wouldn’t be successful in Ottawa’s run and gun offense.
by modsuperstar on Jan 30, 2012 6:15 PM EST up reply actions
agree completely
Also, carter has been injured this season, only played in 30 games, and is in a new city. He had an 8 game scoreless drought, and is still at 10 goals and 7 assists on the year.
He is an elite player. Not every player is offered 10 year contracts, there must be some good character things about him as well. He was also a reserve for the canadian olympic team, in case people forget, putting him in pretty elite company.
The last 3 years of his contract would be able to be bought out for about 5 million, not alot when talking about contracts. and sometmes they work out- like brian campbell has with florida.
-someone else mentioned it above, but you would be hard pressed to sign a 27 year old big forward with the kind of numbers he has for a 5.2mil cap hit out of free agency
-under the current cba, there seem to be teams willing to take on bad contracts with potential if only to reach the cap floor
-why is the danger of overpaying during free agency not being questioned? granted, a guy like parise is unlikely to be a real ville leino-type bust, but stranger things have happened. everyone would rather wait until july 1st so we dont risk losing prospects, but if we are going to get a top 6 winger in free agency we will likely have to overpay because that is how everyone would rather do it!
I would like to
trade Gonchar for Sutter (nashvills dman). Then sign him to an extention. Once this happens hopefully sign Z. Parise (apperantly Sutters best bud) in the offseason. I understand it doesnt help much this season, but that what i would like.
Go luck yourself.
by ottawachiefsfan on Jan 31, 2012 1:03 PM EST reply actions
Hahahaha... really?
I’d like that, too, but Suter’s worth a package of Gonchar, a high pick, and a blue-chipper like Zibanejad or Cowen. And that’s assuming the Predators would be interested in taking on Gonchar’s contract for this season and next, which seems unlikely considering money’s the only reason they might not be able to re-sign Suter.
Silver Seven | Twitter | Facebook | E-mail | eBay
by Peter Raaymakers on Jan 31, 2012 3:31 PM EST up reply actions
Sorry but I have too...
I would like to trade Winchester for Crosby (since he is damaged good we should get a good deal) and then trade Kuba for Drew Doughty – they like each other and it would help this season and for many more to come!

by 





















