No comeback this time: Senators 1, Ducks 2
Stop me if you've heard this one before: Craig Anderson gave his team a chance to win.
Unfortunately tonight, the punchline was that they didn't.
The Anaheim Ducks were the more opportunistic team in this game, smothering the Senators and stealing the thunder of their style of play of late. Much like the Cup Finals in 2007, the goonish Ducks forwards battered the Senators' defensemen with a heavy forecheck, giving them no time to advance the puck and forcing them into bad plays.
There's not much else to say. The Ducks won the important faceoffs, blocked the important shots, and owned a significant lead in shots on goal until the game was already 2-0 in their favor. Sens fans cam complain about the penalty called on Milan Michalek for closing his hand on the puck (forced by a heavy crosscheck that sent him crashing into his own net) or for a non-call on what seemed like a trip late in the game, but reality is that those are excuses.
Anaheim is 7-2-1 in their last ten games, and the bottom line is that they beat Ottawa at its own game tonight: Hard work and opportunistic scoring. No fluke here; the team that deserved to win walked away with the two points.
Fortunately, things aren't as bad as I'm making them sound here. Ottawa wasn't terrible, as they were against Winnipeg; they were simply beaten. That's going to happen, because no team goes 82-0. You can't beat every team with hard work and opportunistic scoring, because sometimes the other guys are willing to work just as hard as you are. Hopefully the team uses it as a learning experience and starts to shake the slow starts they've been experiencing so frequently these past few weeks.
(read on for heroes and zeroes....)
Sens Zero: Erik Karlsson
Rare bad game for the kid tonight, as he was directly responsible for both of the goals scored against. Corey Perry got the puck in perfect position to beat Anderson because Karlsson inexplicably left his man to help partner Filip Kuba retrieve a puck in the corner. Neither defenseman actually got to touch the puck, as Ducks forward Bobby Ryan fed it to an uncovered Perry sitting just a few feet in front of the net. Why Karlsson chose to gamble on that play I'm not sure, but he lost and it cost the team. The second puck was an own-goal--the result of Karlsson batting the puck twice in mid-air. Of course he wasn't trying to score, but it was just an unlucky night for him.
Sens Hero: Chris Neil
At least one Senator came to play tonight. Neil was the team's best forward, scoring Ottawa's lone goal through a simple willingness to crash the net, and he almost evened things up on his next shift with a great shot to create a rebound that net-crashing Nick Foligno couldn't quite get past Jonas Hiller. Neil had four shots on net and led the team with five hits. He was up for this one.
Sens Killer: Blocked shots
Ottawa actually outshot Anaheim in this game, directing at least 50 shots towards Hiller. The problem was that fully 21 of those were blocked. Francois Beauchemin blocked a ridiculous nine all by himself, and he had four blocks before the game was even four minutes old, helping to successfully kill an early Ottawa power play. It was frustrating to watch the puck ricochet anywhere but towards the net all night. The Senators had very few quality scoring chances as a result.
Sens Hero: Craig Anderson
I feel like this is almost obligatory at this point, but the fact is that this game could have been out of hand if not for a number of outstanding saves by Anderson. There's not a human alive who could have made a save on either Anaheim goal, so there's no real fault to lay at the feet of the goaltender. He'll take the loss on the scoresheet, but he definitely doesn't deserve to.
Petersson watch: Forward Andre Petersson put his acting career on hold to make his NHL debut today. He was extremely noticable on his first shift, generating two takeways in the offensive zone, and he also got a shift on the first line while Michalek got a breather after a penalty kill. He did well enough, but as a rookie, only played 5:03. Still, his competitiveness was quite obvious, and he's a player to watch next year.
Shot chart!
via ESPN
Highlights (if you must):
37 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Even Adnan admitted Karlsson was pretty bad tonight.
I think all the relentless harassing has finally improved his objectivity!
Shawn McEachern: The best Senator to ever wear 15.
Zack Smith: The future best Senator to ever wear 15.
by Speedy_McEachern on Jan 21, 2012 9:28 PM EST up reply actions
I don't write my recaps for Adnan's approval
You play like a zero, you get a zero.
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
by Mark Parisi on Jan 21, 2012 10:14 PM EST up reply actions
You should
I love soft players (especially Europeans) that play on the perimeter. Enigmas are awesome. Grit and heart-and-soul are red flags.
Erik Karlsson is better than your favourite player.
Twitter: @sens_adnan
Nah
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
by Mark Parisi on Jan 22, 2012 10:51 AM EST up reply actions
Good recap, Mark.
Very concise.
Shawn McEachern: The best Senator to ever wear 15.
Zack Smith: The future best Senator to ever wear 15.
by Speedy_McEachern on Jan 21, 2012 9:30 PM EST reply actions
Thanks man
I didn’t know how else to recap except to say that we got beaten. There’s not much drama to write about when that’s the case.
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
by Mark Parisi on Jan 21, 2012 10:18 PM EST up reply actions
It is worth noting
Maclean’s comments after the game.
The ref didn’t call Getzlaf’s trip on Karlsson because Karlsson’s a diver.
He told Paulrus that.
Paulrus stood up for Karlsson, saying the kid is leading all D in scoring, one of the best skaters out there, and he isn’t aware of Karlsson ever diving. Neither am I.
Thing is Karlsson got back to his feet and kept control of the puck; I think it wasn’t much contact, but I also think it wasn’t much embellishment, either.
Bad break and I hope this is just a one referee thing. Guys like Ruutu and Tootoo and Kaleta and Lapierre are divers, our star in the making D is not.
"If you aren't diving, you aren't trying"-Jordin Tootoo
PekKarlsson: The genetic mutant solution to all of Nashville and Ottawa's problems. Shea and Alfie approve.
I'm surprised to hear that
I don’t think of Karlsson as a diver at all.
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
by Mark Parisi on Jan 21, 2012 10:15 PM EST up reply actions
That's mystifying.
I can’t remember a time I’ve seen Karlsson dive. He doesn’t draw many penalties, either.
Shawn McEachern: The best Senator to ever wear 15.
Zack Smith: The future best Senator to ever wear 15.
by Speedy_McEachern on Jan 21, 2012 10:27 PM EST up reply actions
He got one diving penalty that I can recall, but yeah the referee is crazy. If he thought Karlsson dove, why not call him for…diving?
I love soft players (especially Europeans) that play on the perimeter. Enigmas are awesome. Grit and heart-and-soul are red flags.
Erik Karlsson is better than your favourite player.
Twitter: @sens_adnan
The one positive is that Anderson and the defense are doing a decent job.
Our offense got stumped by Hillier, it happens, once in a while. Overall, nothing to be worried about.
And there's another reason to love MacLean.
Accusing Karlsson of being a diver is absolutely ridiculous and he let’s him have it in the press. Keep your mouth shut 99% of the time so that when you’re right, people listen.
by Pmoron on Jan 21, 2012 10:56 PM EST via mobile reply actions
I do like the move
Referee reveals his agenda and Paulrus makes it public.
Though I’m not sure we won’t pay for violating the code on this one.
by RogerTheShrubber on Jan 22, 2012 9:08 AM EST up reply actions
Team needs redbull
I thought the lads looked better than they have in a few games, and if a few of the good saves by Hiller had gone in we might have walked out with it.
However, I though the team looked way better for the last 15 minutes or so, as if they’d been reserving their energy for a big push. If they’d played like that the whole game they would have won for sure. The thing that worries me is why they didn’t (or couldn’t). There’s a lot of season left to look so out of gas.
Also, did anyone notice Michalek practically standing still for the last two minutes? Since he’s usually a big effort guy, I just wonder what the matter was.
by RogerTheShrubber on Jan 22, 2012 9:13 AM EST reply actions
Five games in eight days, 6,000 km traveled, three hours time change............
not excuses, but this is tough.
by whatsinaname on Jan 22, 2012 9:28 AM EST up reply actions
Not so much an issue of excuses
More a question of whether they can get past it.
by RogerTheShrubber on Jan 22, 2012 9:52 AM EST up reply actions
Am sure they can...they have crossed the Rubicon,
and there’s no going back.
by whatsinaname on Jan 22, 2012 12:59 PM EST up reply actions
I don't think that expression applies
You can go back to playing mediocre hockey pretty easily. Especially with a bunch of young guys who have never gone 82+ games before.
by RogerTheShrubber on Jan 22, 2012 1:04 PM EST up reply actions
Not sure about what you are saying:
" More a question of whether they can get past it." Get past the loss to the Ducks? Of course they will.
“…get back to playing mediocre hockey pretty easily.” Well, everyone does, once in a while for some, and for some, most of the time.
If you are raising the question will the current team get pass playing mediocre hockey after the Ducks game for the rest of the season, Not sure that question should even be raised after a tightly played, 2-1 loss.
by whatsinaname on Jan 22, 2012 1:24 PM EST up reply actions
No no, not the Ducks game
Not the Ducks game. I meant the physical and mental fatigue that seems to be weighing them down right now.
Despite their record in the last 15 games, I think they’ve looked tired in the past 5-6. I’m concerned that they’re hitting a bit of a wall right now. I’m doubly concerned when I take into account that a lot of what the team has accomplished has been based on sheer drive.
So the issue, in my mind, is whether this young team can keep winning games in the part of the season where injuries and fatigue really start to play a role.
by RogerTheShrubber on Jan 22, 2012 1:31 PM EST up reply actions
Maybe its the fact they have played more games by far.
Maybe this is just me but it seems like the Sens schedule was drafted by a leafs fan (tail end of back to backs against leafs). More games played than any other team by a decent margin (especially Boston wtf?) Its gotta be dragging on them by this point in the season. Hoping the AS break gives them some much needed rest. Love the way the team fights through the adversity and exhaustion to win though.
by Brandon Isenor on Jan 22, 2012 10:48 PM EST up reply actions
The schedule definitely doesn't do the team any favors
But it’s not like they have to deal with the crap that, say, Winnipeg does.
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
by Mark Parisi on Jan 22, 2012 11:02 PM EST up reply actions
Crap to deal with? Like being Winnipeg?
Hahaha Sure they beat the Sens in the last game, but that team is gonna be in for some hard times for awhile. Same with Calgary, Montreal, and Edmonton (even with all their first rounders as of late). Gonna be a few rebuilding Canadian teams joining the Sens and Leafs in the next few years for sure.
by Brandon Isenor on Jan 22, 2012 11:50 PM EST up reply actions
He means their schedule
They are in central Canada and yet have to play 9 games in Carolina, Tampa and Florida. Plus all the eastern teams really.
I love soft players (especially Europeans) that play on the perimeter. Enigmas are awesome. Grit and heart-and-soul are red flags.
Erik Karlsson is better than your favourite player.
Twitter: @sens_adnan
That is a good point.
Here is to hoping the realignment comes along quickly. Wasn’t a huge fan of the 4 conference idea but I’ve never really liked the way the divisions are either. Need to get rid of the division leaders getting a pass into the playoffs too. That’s my opinion anyway.
by Brandon Isenor on Jan 23, 2012 12:06 AM EST up reply actions
I was really hoping they could win this
If purely to “avenge” 2007. But maybe next time. When the scheduling Gods smile on us.
I know!
Sadly, we haven’t even managed to rack up three more wins in four years since 2007, let alone doing it in that series…
Scholar, Gentleman, Shameless Sens Homer with a Heart of Gold.
by Johnny_Spectacular on Jan 22, 2012 10:40 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Despite Neil's goal, I thought he left much to be desired on the powerplay opportunities
He was an ineffective net presence and allowed Hiller to see pucks. He needs to be more assertive if he wants to stay on the PP.
I'd have to agree
I don’t think he belongs on the PP unit. I’d like to see Foligno in his spot there.
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
I thought he had been instrumental in several PP goals
even when he didn’t get points. Asides from him and Foligno, we have Michalek, Greening and possibly Smith that can park themselves in front of the net. How about big Cowen (although I don’t recall much success with Chara’s net presence on the PP when he was here) ? Spezza can do ok when he has someone to sit on.
by whatsinaname on Jan 22, 2012 5:01 PM EST up reply actions
I don't think he's been terrible
I just don’t think he belongs there.
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
The Ducks played us like the Jets did
Waiting at their blue line and looking like a 90’s hockey team. Sens need to start getting leads or they will see this a LOT down the stretch.
"Subdue the enemy without fighting" ~ Sun Tzu
I hated that.
It wasn’t like we were outplayed. They just sat on the lead for 59 minutes (the Jets did).

by 






















