Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Owners Vote to Change Trade Deadline

Which team is the biggest surprise of the 2011-12 season?

The NHL's 2011-12 season has been filled with surprises, both good and bad. Although some of the divisional leaders (the Vancouver Canucks and Boston Bruins, for instance) are fulfilling expectations, there are a lot of teams which have fallen well short of their expectations, and in their place have been many teams far exceeding theirs.

One of the teams far exceeding expectations is, of course, the Ottawa Senators. Fans of the Sens quickly recall dire pre-season predictions that ranked the Senators at or near the bottom of the NHL standings come season's end, and few of the fans thought the Sens would have had anywhere near the success they're having today. The reasons for the surprising turnaround are many, starting first and foremost with Ottawa's forwards.

Many pundits openly wondered where Ottawa's goals would come from this season, looking at the question marks surrounding just about every one of the players up front for Ottawa. Daniel Alfredsson? Old, getting older, and fighting injuries, they thought. Jason Spezza? Immature, and not capable of leading an offence. Milan Michalek? Chronically injured. Nick Foligno? Enigmatic and unpredictable. After those four, it was a toss-up of unproven youngsters who weren't expected to do much. All of these assumptions have been disproven so far this season.

On defence, it was at least as unfortunate. Erik Karlsson was expected to once again lead the Senators' from the blue line, but no one could realistically have predicted the success he's had so far. Little was expected of Filip Kuba and Sergei Gonchar after their disastrous years last year, but both have rebounded quite well--especially Kuba, who's become the most valuable defensive defenceman on Ottawa's roster. Not much was known about David Rundblad, and not much was seen of him before he was dealt early in the year. It was hoped Chris Phillips would rebound from an abysmal season that ended with him at -35, and although he's not as relied upon as he has been in the past, his +12 +1 ranking this season shows some improvement.

In goal, it was expected that most Senators wins would be because of Craig Anderson. Although he has almost single-handedly won some games (Saturday in Montreal a primary example), the team has won in spite of him on other nights, especially earlier in the season.

But, with all the surprises this year, are the Ottawa Senators the biggest surprise? It's difficult to say.

Star-divide

There are plenty of other candidates:

  • Anaheim Ducks: Bad surprise. The Ducks finished fourth in the Western Conference last year, and they didn't lose any key pieces in the off-season (former Sens Andy Sutton and Ray Emery were likely the biggest losses), so they were seen as a sure-fire bet as a playoff team. Instead, they're in second-to-last place in the league, and your guess on how that happened is as good as mine. Teemu Selanne has once again defied his age, and is leading the team in scoring, but Ryan Getzlaf, Jonas Hillar, and (especially) Bobby Ryan have fallen well short of expectations. They've fired their coach, and the GM has said that just about everyone is available on the trade market. Seems like Anaheim is gearing up for a rebuild when they were expected to compete for a Stanley Cup.
  • Columbus Blue Jackets: Awful surprise. Matt Wagner of The Cannon said it best: "When you are given the ingredients for a chocolate cake and somehow turn out a horrifyingly undercooked tuna casserole, people notice." Off-season acquisitions included such big names as Jeff Carter, Vinny Prospal, and James Wisniewski, but suspensions and injuries have really hurt the Jackets this season--but not as much as poor goaltending has. Steve Mason has faltered as starter this year, with a GAA of 3.46 and a SP of .882. Curtis Sanford has done better in his games, but not well enough to move Columbus out of the last-place spot the team has occupied for just about all season.
  • Florida Panthers: Good surprise. Despite some pretty big splashes in the off-season, few people expected the mish-mash of players to come together with any degree of cohesion under rookie coach Kevin Dineen. Well, they did, and then some. Although they're cooling off now that people have caught on, the Panthers started the season like gangbusters, and took an early lead on the Southeast Division and the Eastern Conference (both of which they've since lost). Surprising seasons from off-season signings Kris Versteeg, Brian Campbell, and Jose Theodore were the key parts of their early-season success. The Panthers lost their lead in the Southeast Division, knocking them down to seventh in the East and falling fast, so it could turn out that their surprising success was short-lived.
  • New York Rangers: Good surprise. It was expected the Rangers would be in playoff position, but name me someone who says they'd predicted the Rangers would be well ahead of all takers across the league and I'll name you someone who's (probably) lying. The Rangers biggest reason for success is Henrik Lundqvist, but even scoring through the lineup, led by a healthy Marian Gaborik, has put the Rangers where they are today.
  • St. Louis Blues: Good surprise. The Blues are perhaps the most surprising team in the league, but they've almost certainly got the most surprisingly successful player in the league in Brian Elliott. Elliott had an absolutely awful season with the Senators and Colorado Avalanche last season, but so far this season he's taken the starting reins from Jaroslav Halak, led the Blues to the top spot in the Central Division, and earned his first nod as an NHL All-Star. Forwards David Backes, T.J. Oshie, and newcomer Jason Arnott have contributed to the success, too, but Elliott's been the driver of the Blues' bus.
  • Tampa Bay Lightning: Terrible surprise. Tampa Bay's been scoring goals fairly well this season (at least at the top of the lineup), but keeping them out has been a major problem--despite head coach Guy Boucher's extremely conservative 1-3-1 system. Dwayne Roloson has been terrible and Mathieu Garon has been little better, while the defence has been exposed as undersized and inefficient. While some might have predicted some struggles this season, no one would have predicted Tampa Bay falling to last place in the Eastern Conference--which is where they sit today.
  • Washington Capitals: Bad surprise. Washington was the Eastern Conference's best team in the regular season last year, and with the acquisitions of Tomas Vokoun and Roman Hamrlik, not to mention several good role-players, it was expected the Capitals would improve on that this year. Instead, the opposite has happened, and before their win last night, the Capitals were sitting outside the playoffs. With the win, they're still barely in it, although they are clawing their way back towards their expected standing. Their primary scoring--namely Alex Ovechkin--isn't scoring as well as he has to, but their secondary scoring has failed to produce as well as they need to, as well. Vokoun's numbers are in line with his career totals, but something just hasn't been working for the Capitals. If it was former bench boss Bruce Boudreau, and the Caps end up in a playoff spot (which seems likely as they improve and Florida falls back to Earth), they've certainly got the skill to compete for a Stanley Cup.

This list may not even be complete. The Montreal Canadiens, Buffalo Sabres, and Calgary Flames are all playing below expectations, while the New Jersey Devils and Winnipeg Jets are both better than expected.

Which team, in your estimation, has been the NHL's biggest surprise so far?

Poll
Which team do you think has been the NHL's most surprising this season?
Anaheim Ducks
12 votes
Columbus Blue Jackets
9 votes
Florida Panthers
23 votes
New York Rangers
10 votes
Ottawa Senators
240 votes
St. Louis Blues
24 votes
Tampa Bay Lightning
13 votes
Washington Capitals
11 votes
other
7 votes

349 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 51 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Neither the Blues, Ducks, Rangers, or Lightning were surprises to me

The signs were all there last season. The others (excepting Columbus) are a little more surprising, but I doubt Florida is a playoff team, and Washington will still win their division.

by TheGuineaPig on Jan 16, 2012 10:03 AM EST reply actions  

I voted Washington

They are back to the 3rd seed, but I am still shocked by how much they have struggled.

I love soft players (especially Europeans) that play on the perimeter. Enigmas are awesome. Grit and heart-and-soul are red flags.

Erik Karlsson is better than your favourite player.
Twitter: @sens_adnan

by Adnan on Jan 16, 2012 10:07 AM EST reply actions  

We also couldn’t beat Montréal before Thursday.

I love soft players (especially Europeans) that play on the perimeter. Enigmas are awesome. Grit and heart-and-soul are red flags.

Erik Karlsson is better than your favourite player.
Twitter: @sens_adnan

by Adnan on Jan 16, 2012 1:01 PM EST up reply actions  

true

hopefully we will take the last game against the Caps and the remaing games vs the Habs

by SBS138 on Jan 16, 2012 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Washington is surprising me

But they remind me of the 2006-07 Ottawa Senators. The Sens didn’t start that year well, but had an incredible February and a good March to climb the standings, and then went forward from there. Maybe it’s just taking the Capitals some time to get settled.

by Peter Raaymakers on Jan 16, 2012 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

At this point I’m going to point to a fanpost I did in June.

http://www.silversevensens.com/2011/6/6/2209233/2011-12-ottawa-senators-2009-10-colorado-avalanche

Though I can’t say that was written with much more than some observations and wishful thinking.

by modsuperstar on Jan 16, 2012 10:08 AM EST reply actions  

I voted other...

Buffalo. I had them as a lock for the playoffs, the only team I was sure of in the east besides Boston.

/why they play the games

by DrZee on Jan 16, 2012 10:19 AM EST reply actions  

Buffalo's a good choice...it reminds me a someone who, after years of

eating light decides to change diet but ends up choking on the new rich food due to a poor diet plan. Like kid in a candy store allowed to eat anything and ends up merely sick.

by whatsinaname on Jan 16, 2012 11:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Ottawa should have been excluded from the poll

For reasons of obvious impartiality.

Also, it is Steve Mason that plays goal for Columbus. Chris Mason plays (backup goal) for the Jets.

Otherwise, the true surprise to me is that Toronto has players other than Kessel/Grabovski scoring, and a goalie other than Reimer that can stop the puck. It looks like Ron Wilson got his head out of Brian Burkes a** long enough to actually coach his team. Leafs are actually looking a lot better than i expected from them.

Common sense is the most evenly distributed quality in all the world.
Everyone thinks they have enough.

by havey03 on Jan 16, 2012 10:28 AM EST reply actions  

I disagree about Ottawa's inclusion in the poll...

For the most part, we are all die-hard Sens’ fans. If WE are surprised about their success, then I’d wager the rest of the league (and other teams’ fans) are even more surprised at our success.

Similar to what Los Blancos Chicca said, I live in the GTA, and I am constantly talking to Leaf fans about what is happening in Ottawa. Even Leaf fans are surprised at where the Sens are right now… hell, some of them are even supportive, and looking forward to a possible Sens vs. Leafs playoff series.

ALFIE! ALFIE! ALFIE!

by BigSlice on Jan 16, 2012 11:13 AM EST up reply actions  

I did not mean to suggest that Ottawa's performance hasn't been surprising

More so, I believe that the majority of us, if not all of us are surprised at Ottawa’s performance to date this season.

What I meant to indicate was that the results of the poll were predictable given that Ottawa was included in the poll. I would be curious to see whom the most surprising team is (excluding us) if the 26 people to date that have voted for Ottawa didn’t have that option.

Common sense is the most evenly distributed quality in all the world.
Everyone thinks they have enough.

by havey03 on Jan 16, 2012 11:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Like it or not, Ottawa should be included.

The rest of the league is talking about us being a surprise. If anything, we of all people should not be surprised the Sens are doing well because we’d seen what this team is capable of since February of last year and we have dissected them like nobody else has except the Sens management. So yea, we should lobby for an advisory chair on the team management.

by whatsinaname on Jan 16, 2012 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

i think not putting Ottawa in such a poll is indefensible

I listen to HNIC Radio on Sirius all the time and can tell you a number of pundits see Ottawa as one of, if not the, surprise team of the season so far. Hell, i even heard it pretty much agreed to on the Toronto Sports Network.

We can’t pretend they’re not there just because we’re fans. What a Canadian thing to do…

by west-sider on Jan 16, 2012 11:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I think he was just saying that we’re all very biased towards Ottawa, so we should just vote on other teams. I think havey03 probably agrees that Ottawa is the most surprising team.

Co-manager, Silver Seven

by DarrenM on Jan 16, 2012 12:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly

Currently 102 votes for Ottawa – a total of 40 for all other teams. Most of us would have predicted a result like that by default.

Take those 102 votes though, and distribute them among the remaining options, does St Louis keep it up as most surprising?

Common sense is the most evenly distributed quality in all the world.
Everyone thinks they have enough.

by havey03 on Jan 16, 2012 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I caught that Mason mistake too as I was reading it, so I edited it. Thanks!

Co-manager, Silver Seven

by DarrenM on Jan 16, 2012 11:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Does anyone else think there won't be a playoff race in the east?

I think Florida and Winnipeg will drop off and I wouldn’t be shocked if BOS, NYR, WAS, PHI, PIT, OTT, NJ, TOR clinch with 2-3 games to go.

I love soft players (especially Europeans) that play on the perimeter. Enigmas are awesome. Grit and heart-and-soul are red flags.

Erik Karlsson is better than your favourite player.
Twitter: @sens_adnan

by Adnan on Jan 16, 2012 10:32 AM EST reply actions  

The only team I could realistically see making a run is the Jets, just by virtue that I believe they won’t settle for not shooting for the playoffs. They’ll make some moves at the deadline and shore up their team a bit.

by modsuperstar on Jan 16, 2012 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

i like the Jets chances too

Pavelec has been playing better of late and could be pulling into an Anderson-gear himself. They need to add up front but i could see them catch a fading Toronto or, even Pittsburgh depending on how long guys like Letang are out.

by west-sider on Jan 16, 2012 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

This is a year full of suprises in the NHL.

I voted Ottawa. havey03 implied that voting for Ottawa may be impartial, I disagree. The way I saw it is that if I wasn’t expecting Ottawa to be playing as well as they have, and I follow the team religiously, then they are an even bigger surprize to the fans of other teams. All non-Sens fans I come across keep asking me “What is going on in Ottawa??” “Who are these people on the Sens??” “How do they keep winning??”

The other shocker for me is St. Louis. I am surprized at Elliot’s play this year. Good for them but I was not expecting that team to be where they are today. I usually forget about them (not to be harsh they usually leave no impact on me)

Washington I expected not to be strong in the East. I still think they will make the playoffs, but I didn’t think they would be in the top in the East. I thought the Rangers, Bruins and Flyers would be the strongest teams in the East.

by Los Blancos Chicca on Jan 16, 2012 10:38 AM EST reply actions  

Okay, so someone (Adnan I think) pointed out we could be leading the division after tonight

If we win and Boston loses.

But past that, if we also win tomorrow night we could be 3rd in the league if:

Boston loses tonight or tomorrow in regulation (or both in OT/SO)
Detroit loses tonight or tomorrow in regulation (or both in OT/SO)
St Louis loses tonight
Vancouver loses tomorrow (in regulation)

And leading the league Friday morning if they also beat San Jose and (in addition to the above):

Rangers lose tomorrow and Thursday (1 in regulation)
Chicago loses tomorrow

Odds? I’d assume “not so good”, considering it requires the top 7 teams to be held to 15 points or less (properly distributed) across 14 games in the next 4 days and Ottawa to win another 3 in a row. But the fact that I can easily list the circumstances that would put Ottawa at 1st in the league right now is huge considering the pre-season predictions.

by B_T on Jan 16, 2012 11:47 AM EST reply actions  

would be somewhat meaningless though

As Boston will still have 4 games in hand on us by week’s end. Man, their goal differential is +69!!

by west-sider on Jan 16, 2012 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

I wouldn’t expect it to last long either, because at that point (past what seems like long odds for it to happen at all):

Rangers would have 3 games in hand
Chicago would have 2 games in hand
Vancouver would have 2 games in hand
St Louis would have 3 games in hand
Boston would have 5 games in hand
Detroit would have 2 games in hand
Philly would have 3 games in hand

Past the teams ahead of us right now:

San Jose would have 5 games in hand
Nashville would have 2 games in hand
New Jersey would have 3 games in hand

And all of the above could, theoretically, catch us with wins in those games in hand.

by B_T on Jan 16, 2012 12:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I was talking about this point last week, that games in hand does not mean guaranteed points. It just means all those teams will have a more hectic schedule coming down the stretch when the season starts dragging out.

by modsuperstar on Jan 16, 2012 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

You're right that it doesn't mean guaranteed points

But we can’t assume they’ll lose them all either.

by B_T on Jan 16, 2012 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

But it would still be fun!

Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs

by Mark Parisi on Jan 16, 2012 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Hrm

I’ve made myself curious enough to run some numbers over lunch based on L10 performances….

by B_T on Jan 16, 2012 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Sneak peek

Using a fairly basic methodology, I give Ottawa a 27% chance of winning all 3 games through Thursday.

by B_T on Jan 16, 2012 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Alright, let's do this

Methodology

I started by calculating the individual game odds based on the L10 records of the teams involved. Each team’s L10 was given equal weight.

Example: Ottawa’s L10 gives them an 80% chance of a win. Winnipeg’s L10 gives them a 60% chance of a loss. Combining them, it gives the odds tonight as 70% chance of a win.

The odds of a loss were then further split into regulation and OT/SO losses, based on the how the team’s losses have falled in their L10. Only the losing team’s numbers are looked at for this – the number of times the winning team has won in OT/SO were not taken into consideration.

Example: In the previous example, Ottawa’s odds of winning against Winnipeg were 70%, meaning a 30% chance of a loss. As Ottawa has 1 regulation loss and 1 OT loss in their last 10, this further breaks down to a 15% chance of a regulation loss and 15% chance of an OT/SO loss.

All games were projected based on current L10 records. I did not project future L10 records for teams playing multiple games through Thursday.

Example: While Ottawa could go into Toronto with a L10 of 9-0-1, 8-0-2 or 8-1-1, the odds of that game were calculated with the current L10 of 8-1-1.

I then determined the max points each of the teams could get to see Ottawa in 1st after Thursday, assuming 3 Ottawa wins.

I calculated out the odds of each team having that record at best. Oddly enough, with the exception of the Rangers, Canucks and Flyers that simply meant “not winning every game”. For the Rangers, it meant not winning at all. For the Canucks and Flyers, it doesn’t matter if they win or not.

The product of all of these odds is Ottawa’s chance of being 1st on Thursday.

I also calculated out what it would take for Ottawa to be in first if they go 2-0-1 through Thursday, but it was significantly worse.

Potential sources of error are factors that were left off for simplicity (home vs away records, back to back games, current streak, etc.). For the Rangers, Bruins and Wings, their L10 includes no OT losses so the model does not see this as a possibility, even though it realistically is.

The Numbers

The easy one first – Ottawa. Ottawa needs all 3 wins to have the best chance of this all falling out. The individual games were 70% vs Winnipeg, 65% vs Toronto and 60% vs San Jose. This gives Ottawa a 27.3% chance of winning all 3 games.

The rest from the top down:

The Rangers have a 50% chance of losing to Nashville, and 35% chance of losing to Pittsburgh. This combines to 17.5% chance of losing both.

Chicago only has 1 game, and has a 45% chance of losing.

Vancouver has 1 game, and can win or lose. 100%

St Louis has 2 games. With a 55% chance of winning against Dallas and 70% against Edmonton, they’ve got a 38.5% chance of winning both. We flip this to get the chance of losing 1, and get 61.5%

Boston has 70% odds of a win against Florida, 70% against Tampa and 55% against New Jersey. To win all 3, it is 26.95% – flip it like with St Louis for a 73.05% chance of not doing so.

Detroit has a 70% chance against Buffalo, 60% chance against Dallas and 75% against Phoenix. That’s 31.5% chance of winning all 3, which flips to 68.5% chance of losing 1 or more.

Philadelphia can win or lose both of their games. 100%

At this point, we simply combine them all. The result?

0.66%

by B_T on Jan 16, 2012 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

So you are saying…there is a chance then?

I love soft players (especially Europeans) that play on the perimeter. Enigmas are awesome. Grit and heart-and-soul are red flags.

Erik Karlsson is better than your favourite player.
Twitter: @sens_adnan

by Adnan on Jan 16, 2012 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep!

But for odds compounded across 27 games and 8 teams, it’s not too bad.

by B_T on Jan 16, 2012 3:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I tend to do that

I tried to lay it all out coherently though!

Maybe next time I’ll just spin a wheel.

by B_T on Jan 16, 2012 3:07 PM EST up reply actions  

+12

Chris Phillips? i think you’re wrong here.

by SBS138 on Jan 16, 2012 1:12 PM EST reply actions  

You're right

I wasn’t paying close enough attention, he’s actually +1. (I think I was looking under his points column, because he’s already got 12 points.)

Thanks for the note! I’ll make the correction.

by Peter Raaymakers on Jan 16, 2012 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

his 12 points is equally as impressive for a guy who is not expected to get much points. hopefully he’ll net his first goal soon.

by SBS138 on Jan 16, 2012 1:54 PM EST reply actions  

I like that we both chose the same picture for our articles

Great minds and all that.

Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs

by Mark Parisi on Jan 16, 2012 2:13 PM EST reply actions  

I didn't even look at yours

I just thought to myself, “That’s a whole lot of green,” and happily watched Drive, then went to bed.

Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs

by Mark Parisi on Jan 16, 2012 3:52 PM EST up reply actions  

I was going to use that picture, until I noticed it was already used.

I love soft players (especially Europeans) that play on the perimeter. Enigmas are awesome. Grit and heart-and-soul are red flags.

Erik Karlsson is better than your favourite player.
Twitter: @sens_adnan

by Adnan on Jan 16, 2012 3:58 PM EST up reply actions  

But then you reused another one

Fail buddies?

Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs

by Mark Parisi on Jan 16, 2012 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Ha oh yeah Darren’s!

I love soft players (especially Europeans) that play on the perimeter. Enigmas are awesome. Grit and heart-and-soul are red flags.

Erik Karlsson is better than your favourite player.
Twitter: @sens_adnan

by Adnan on Jan 16, 2012 4:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The unofficial Ottawa Senators blog

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Sb_small
Alfie: "The kids want me to continue."

Recent FanPosts

Sens_small
Signing our own free agent?
Karlsson_small
Targeting Del Zotto
Nhl_entry_draft_portraits_8_xtv5um7c5l_small
A look at senators depth: Defensemen Addition
Small
Clouston Fired yet again
Small
BM's summer vacation
Nhl_entry_draft_portraits_8_xtv5um7c5l_small
A look at senators depth: Center Addition
Marv_facebook_small
Our style won't win us any playoff series
Karlssonpoint_small
Playoffs prediction competition: round three
Small
Sens sign D Fredrik Claesson to three-year entry-level deal.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Heritage_small Peter Raaymakers

Hutz_small DarrenM

Editors

Sens_small Mark Parisi

Sens-suicidebooth_small Ryan Classic

Authors

Small DaveYoung

Karlssonpoint_small Adnan

Small Varada

Bobby__small bobbykelly

Bosch_small Amelia L