Sens win ugly over Sabres in shootout, 3-2
You are probably as shocked as I am that the Ottawa Senators and Buffalo Sabres played a one-goal game. But it's true. It happened. And it was ugly. Both teams had played games the night before (Ottawa winning 4-3 over Calgary and Buffalo losing 3-1 to Washington) and it showed as the game wore on. By the third period, it was clear from the sluggish and chippy play that the players from both teams were tired. Even speedsters like Erik Karlsson and Nathan Gerbe were doing more gliding than hard striding.
Though Ottawa only had four power plays and Buffalo had five, there were 18 penalties called in this game. As the quality of play dropped, the animosity grew. I didn't feel the officials did a good job of maintaining order -- early in the third period, a simple scrum turned into Z. Smith trying to fight everyone. That should have been the end of things, yet talk and punches escalated, and the final result was Smith, Chris Neil, T.J. Brennan, and Jason Pominville all serving two minutes for roughing. Nice.
The Senators' offense tonight was carried by Matt "Silent Scope" Carkner and Chris "King Breakaway" Neil. Early in the second, Kyle Turris found Matt Carkner on the far side of the ice. Since Turris had drawn four Sabres players to him (this was a common, and effective tactic for Buffalo tonight) he made the decision to pass to the open man, even if it was a lumbering defenseman. But it was the right decision, because Carkner had nothing but Buffalo goalie Jhonas Enroth between him and the net, and he beat Enroth on the glove side with a great shot.
Neil, meanwhile, was also the recipient of a smart pass, as he hopped on the ice to start his shift and noticed that Z. Smith had gotten possession of the puck and passed it to Erik Condra. Rather than moving to support the two, Neil skated behind the Sabres defensemen. Condra saw him and hit him with the pass, and after a little forehand-backhand move, the game was tied at two all.
After that, things bogged down and the third period and the teams looked like they were playing to split the point and decide it in overtime: Buffalo managed just six shots, and of Ottawa's 14, just three were not from the perimeter:
Putrid, right? With a shot chart like that, the game unsurprisingly went to overtime, which was also ugly, so we're not going to recap that, and then on to the shootout.
I was not worried initially because despite Enroth's impressive save percentage, the Senators had beaten him frequently in the game, and Craig Anderson had been pretty solid. But after Brad Boyes froze Anderson completely and Pominville had beaten him cleanly five-hole, the doubt crept in. Ottawa had used up its best shooters in Milan Michalek, Jason Spezza, and Daniel Alfredsson already. Spezza and Alfie had scored to keep Ottawa in it, but Buffalo still had Derek Roy and Drew Stafford in their pockets. Whatever had been plaguing Anderson was gone, because he stoned both guys. Meanwhile, Ottawa's fourth shooter was none other than Condra, who had performed well in the Sens Skills competition earlier this week. Unfortunately, his attempt at a quick glove snipe was stopped, and it was all up to Bobby Butler to win the game. With great patience and a nice backhand-forehand roofed shot, he did.
We're not going to discuss the Buffalo goals, because I hate Buffalo.
(read on for heroes and zeros...)
Sens Killer: The posts
By my count, Ottawa hit six posts tonight. That's a lot. And they weren't "Oh, he shot it at the side of the net and it hit the post" shots, they were "Enroth got beaten cleanly and the shot hit the post instead of the back of the net" shots. Those shots won't even count as shots on goal, but the fact remains that Ottawa beat Enroth eight times tonight, not counting the shootout. This could have very easily been a different game.
Sens Killer: Power Play
I don't even know what to say here. The team's power play has looked terrible the past two games. The Sens went 0-for-4 with the man advantage tonight and couldn't even generate a decent scoring chance. The last opportunity came with just under four minutes remaining--a great opening to bury a division rival. Instead, I don't even remember a shot on goal. If the Senators expect to make the playoffs, they need their special teams to be performing better. Goals from Carkner and Neil aren't going to carry the day in a 1 vs. 8 matchup against Boston, for instance. If the Senators can't get consistent scoring from their power play units, they're going to get smoked big time, and that's if they make the playoffs. That's no guarantee if a performance like tonight's is going to be considered acceptable by anyone in the organization.
Sens Killer: Faceoffs
Ottawa was smoked on the dot all night long. Only Zenon Konopka managed to win more of his draws than he lost, going 7 of 13. The rest of the faceoffs, with commentary:
Colin Greening: 0 of 1 - Ha!
Kyle Turris: 3 of 16 - This is a pitiful performance at any level.
Jason Spezza: 8 of 29 - Spezza talked about working his shot after winning the hardest shot competition. Clearly he used the time where was working on his faceoff skills.
Z. Smith: 5 of 11 - Barely acceptable. Like being proud of passing a test with a 65.
Sens Hero: Erik Karlsson
Karlsson had ten shots tonight, and those were just the ones that made it to the net. That output was equal to the combined efforts of Alfredsson, Butler, Carkner, Konopka, Kuba, and Z. Smith. That's six other guys!
Karlsson had no points to show for his efforts.
But he also got it done defensively in this game, finishing plus-1 and putting on a great show of speed to thwart a Pominville breakaway in the first period, when players still had energy. The kid simply put his head down, charged down the ice as fast as he could, and with the sweep of a stick, knocked the puck of Pominville's stick. The only way to defend a breakaway better is not to give one up.
Sens Hero: Erik Condra
Condra had a two point night and earned both his assists with good vision. I wish I had the kind of effusive praise for him that I did for Karlsson, but the fact is that Condra was the Sens' best forward tonight, and it showed on the scoreboard. I didn't think he'd mesh well with Turris after seeing the chemistry he had with Z. Smith since the two centers are so different, but Condra's intelligence seems to go well with Turris' skills. It's a promising sign.
Sens Zero: Zenon Konopka
Konopka played a great game against Calgary, so it was disappointing to see him leave tonight with not one, but two game misconducts. He only served the first, which came for saying naughty words to an official, as the second was assessed at the end of OT. As mentioned above, he was the lone bright spot on faceoffs, but he cannot take those kinds of penalties and expect to be a contributor to the team's win--he had just 7:29 TOI tonight.
Sens Zero: Jason Spezza
Looked as bad tonight as he looked good last night. His struggles in the faceoff circle were already mentioned, but he also took two avoidable penalties and finished the night minus-1--one of only three Sens to do so. His shootout goal was nice, and critical to the team's victory, but that does not outweigh 24:38 of ineffectual play.
Shot chart! (For all the periods this time)
Highlights:
Happy New Year, everybody!
34 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Come on Mark Konopka a zero?? harsh..
I was under the impression he was trying to get Gaustad to fight as Neil had tried to earlier, carryover from the last game…of course Gaustad didn’t oblige. Having said that the 10 mins misconduct didn’t cost his team and he has started taking important defensive zone faceoffs like he was last year in NYI…considering he was the only one with a better than 50% faceoff percentage against a very good faceoff team alone should keep him from being a zero…make no mistake like I said weeks ago he would become a player on this team and he has, the misconduct was simply him not forgetting someone who cheapshotted once of his teammates
As for a 10 min misconduct at the end of the overtime?? honestly big deal…
Considering he had the 10 min and STILL played over 7 mins which is about average for him shows that the coach is having alot more faith in having him out there in important situations…
His TOI was consistent with what he typically receives, and he performed in the dot. He took a dumb tripping penalty but stood up for teammates elsewhere in the game. I wouldn’t hero or zero him, personally.
He had 2 X 10 min misconducts…no minors. Again make no mistake, his track record is speaking for itself the last month or so…the only reason why he took the misconduct was due to past indiscretions from a gutless unaccountable player…i.e Gaustad. Both him and Kaleta are the biggest talk the talk and never walk the walk players in the league, zero accountability.
Gaustad doesn't give out penalties last time I checked
He didn’t take the misconducts because Gaustad and Kaleta are gutless players. He took them because he couldn’t control himself on the ice and the officials saw it.
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
Gaustad knocks out Winchester with a dirty hit…bottom line players like Neil and Konopka will not forget, it is not about controlling himself it is about retribution for a dirty hockey play, like it or not, it’s the way it works, you knock out one of our players there will be repercussions to be paid. The 10 min misconduct did not hurt his team in anyway other than show him he is willing to stand up and make Gaustad accountable for his actions.
Also overall I think your assessment is a bit harsh
Sens had 46 shots and 6 posts?? I would call that a dominant performance overall as opposed to “winning ugly”
Also in Spezza’s defense he was 6 for 20 against Gaustad…traditionally a top 5 faceoff percentage man in the league each year…
Yeah we pretty much dominated them
Outshot 46-28, 6 posts, and the guys at the 6th sens tracked scoring chances at 29-20 for us.
Erik Karlsson is better than your favourite player.
Twitter: @sens_adnan
Right, like firing 100 rounds and hitting the bullseye once is dominating a target
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
6 posts…even if 2 of those bounced in instead of out and this is at worst a 4-2 victory….Ottawa outshot Buffalo in each period…something rarely done. Also can be argued the Gaustad goal should have been disallowed….I feel Buffalo was lucky to have gotten a point out of this game, one bad bounce off the shoulder of a high hard one and this one may not have been close, Buffalo generated very little in the way of offence.
But they didn't go in
And the Gaustad goal wasn’t disallowed. If you’re going argue what ifs, you may as well say that Ottawa should have won 52-2.
Your argument that Buffalo generated little in the way of offense is irrelevant; I did not claim the Sabres played well anywhere.
I’ve already made it clear that It doesn’t matter that Ottawa outshot Buffalo each period because the quality of shots was poor. That stat by itself is not indicative of “domination,” it’s merely indicative of a high volume of shots. One has to literally ignore the way the game was actually played to accept your argument that the Senators were the better team because they were statistically superior in ONE category. As I have already said below, the Sabres were better on the power play, better on the penalty kill, and had more breakaways than the Senators.
It was an ugly game between two tired teams. No one was better, though the Senators were unlucky, and that’s why it was decided in the shootout.
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
I am basing my opinion on what I saw and what I saw was a team that outplayed another…can’t speak for the in depth statistical numbers that you present, I only go by my own opinion of the better part of 3 decades of watching the game. If you read the post game article the players agree…http://www.ottawasun.com/2011/12/31/butler-scores-ot-winner-for-sens
So therefore I disagree also…
32 of those 46 shots were from the perimeter and posed no real scoring threat
It may look nice on a stats sheet, but that’s not my idea of a “dominant” performance. There was no sustained offensive zone time on the power play, 5-on-5, or 4-on-4. Our forwards did not attack with any speed because there was no open ice. We didn’t have a lead at any point in the game. The power play was 0-for-4. The penalty kill allowed a goal. The defensemen allowed two breakaways, one saved by Karlsson and the other saved by the end of the second period.
This was in no way a dominant performance.
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
I know we're not even halfway through the season yet, but...
…it’s always nice when the Sens are in a playoff spot, and the Leafs are not.
by spez_dispenser on Jan 1, 2012 1:13 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd
One of few things I found satisfying about this NYE, I gotta say. Good way to start 2012 for our team!
by Pirateninjabot on Jan 1, 2012 1:55 AM EST up reply actions
Andy's flirting with the exclusive .900 club.
As well, here’s a couple interesting facts.
The only teams to score more goals this year are: Boston, Philly, Pitt, Chicago, Detroit, Van. Pretty elite teams, if you ask me.
The only teams to allow more goals: Carolina. That is all.
by Pmoron on Jan 1, 2012 2:18 AM EST via mobile reply actions
This game could only have been improved by Konopka scoring a goal
Enforcers and fighters producing all the team’s offence would have been amusing, if worrying.
I’m not sure I’d agree that the Senators dominated the Sabres last night. Sure, the shot count was high in favour of the Sens, but based on the scoring chances provided by the 6th Sens (and mentioned above by Adnan), 5 of every 7 shots by the Sabres were scoring chances, compared to (approximately) 5 of every 8 by the Senators. There were many shots from the perimeter, and I don’t know how many times Enroth gave up a rebound but nobody was there to take advantage of it.
Put another way, the Senators may have been dominant, but they didn’t make it look easy.
I love that Carkner and Neil both scored
And they were actually really nice goals. Move Carkner to the first line wing aside Milan and Jason, watch him score 30!
He's not ready
He needs seasoning with the 67s first
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
I don't think he has the speed to make it as a winger in Atom
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
Good Game For Andy
The shootout goals sucked but he gave a chance to win last night.
Power play commentary...
I also disagree with your assessment about the power play…sure last nights game was not good, no Gonchar in the lineup is speaking volumes when it comes to the PP, however against Cgy the PP was 1 for 3 and scored the winning goal…hardly “terrible”
Once again you just throw out a stat
1 for 3! That’s not terrible!
It was terrible. The goal they scored in OT was the result of a 4-on-3 power play. The two 5-on-4 power plays that were executed in regulation were done poorly. It was a statistically fine game, but once again, the play on the ice belied the final result.
Since the Florida game on the 22nd, the power play has been abysmal.
Against Montreal, not only did they go 0-for-3, but they gave up a shorthanded goal.
Against Carolina, they were 0-for-1.
They have not executed well in almost two weeks of play and they did not execute well last night. One good goal from Alfie doesn’t change that.
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
There's speed.
Then there’s 65’s speed. That was ridiculous. He was 10 feet behind Pominville (a fast skater) and caught him in 10 har strides. Brilliant.
"I couldn't score in a brothel...couldn't finish a sandwich"
- Joe Corvo
And not just caught him
Perfect use of his stick to sweep the puck away. He still could have hooked or slashed or other moves that would have created a penalty, or worse, a penalty shot. It was a perfect defensive play.
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
Kuba played over 33 minutes!
Really hope he is okay.
Erik Karlsson is better than your favourite player.
Twitter: @sens_adnan

by 





















