Thoughts from Atlanta
I attended last night's game, which Peter recapped here. Here are my impressions:
- I think that should the team re-sign Craig Anderson, whatever salary he receives won't be an overpayment. I guess the highest praise I can give him is that if I were recapping this game, I wouldn't have marked him down as a hero. His positioning was so sound that his saves looked incredibly routine in person. I kept finding myself wondering why the Thrashers were taking such low-percentage shots. In fact, there wasn't a single shot taken the entire night that I felt had a legitimate chance of getting by him. Even on Stapleton's breakaway, Anderson immediately charged out to challenge and then set his feet like he was in a tug-of-war (which I found weird, but, hey, I don't play goal) and there was just nowhere for the shooter to go. I'm not willing to say he was perfect, because I felt like he played a little too far out of his net at times. It looked to me like there were gaps that better passing teams would have been able to exploit after the rebounds, but the Thrashers were clearly not that team last night.
That's not why we can't overpay him, however. He has an absolute command over his own zone. It's really impressive to watch. I've never seen a goalie use their stick for anything except penalty kills and powerplays, but Anderson beats the ice like it's a rented mule. He's also wildly gesturing constantly, which means he will forevermore be nicknamed KoKo to me, but the effect it has on our defensemen is noticeable. They're already confident he's reading the play correctly and as a result, there were very few turnovers in our own end. It also gives him better lanes to see shots. In short, he's providing the leadership that Phillips and Gonchar weren't. I don't know if there was some kind of communication gap before, but it seemed clear that everyone trusts Anderson. If we're really going to be adding Jared Cowen and David Rundblad to our mix next season, paying more than market value for Craig Anderson will make it worth it if only for the effect he'll have on their development. Wow. I really want to see if the defense looks as organized with McElhinney in net. I bet not.
It's like a golf swing, I suppose. Your eye follows the trajectory of the ball based on where your club swing makes it go. If you hit true, you can immediately pick the ball up in flight once to finish your swing. If you hooked or sliced (which I do all the time) it takes you an extra second to locate the ball in flight. Butler's shot was like that. Mason's glove was where the shot should have gone. It was where my eyes told me the puck should have gone. The puck just wasn't there. That's pretty fucking impressive. When he says that he wants to score 30 goals next year, I suddenly find it easy to believe him.
I also felt part of his struggle was his attempt to do to much, which is understandable -- he wants to do better. After his stick broke, he was running all over the place in his own end kicking at the puck and generally making things worse for everyone involved. I was screaming at him to just leave the puck alone and let his partner take care of it, but it sure looked like he was overcompensating for a mistake in the other end.
Final notes: The Senators are now 2-0 when I watch them this season, which is much better than their record when I recap. Lifetime they're now 5-3 when I'm in attendance. I really love watching this team play.
This FanPost was written by a member of the Silver Seven community, and does not necessarily reflect the beliefs or opinions of the site managers, editors, or Sports Blogs Nation, Inc.
58 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Karlsson should play with Gonchar
His struggles started when they paired him with Phillips, and now Kuba. He was doing pretty solidly before the new year when he was with…actually I don’t remember if it was Gonchar or Campoli.
But in any case, he generally hasn’t performed well with Kuba or Phillips.
Trying to be Erik Karlsson's agent since October, 2010.
Hale
From what I have seen Karlsson’s best play came when he was partnered with Hale. Also, last year down the stretch he played well with Sutton.
On the other hand, Gonchar has played well since the new year. I am not sure who he has been consistently partnered with, but it hasn’t been Karlsson.
Also, your choice of wording is poor, Mr. English major
You mean to say (I think) that no matter what the Sens pay Anderson, it won’t be an overpayment.
But when you say “I don’t believe the team can overpay for Craig Anderson” it sounds like the Sens shouldn’t pay him too much.
So take that! Now I will finish reading the rest of your article. My eyes generally float to Karlsson first.
Trying to be Erik Karlsson's agent since October, 2010.
Ha, I've already edited it twice
I like your version better, so I’m editing it thrice.
ATTENTION ALL OTHER READERS, MY ENGLISH IS PERFECT ALWAYS
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
*always perfect
It reads better, even if what you wrote isn’t actually incorrect.
Oh Captain, my Captain!
Shhh
Exaggeration makes for better comedic effect.
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
True, but my version has too much passive voice
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
Since you changed it, you need a comma before the should.
You need to bracket that phrase in commas, not just put one at the end. I demand a fourth edit!
Oh Captain, my Captain!
Sue him!
In the name of Her Majesty the Queen!
Trying to be Erik Karlsson's agent since October, 2010.
...or in my name so that the money could go to me.
But for what? Grammatical assault?
Oh Captain, my Captain!
Negative, ghost rider
There’s only two clauses there. One comma is all that’s necessary. You’re adding a comma under the “put a comma wherever you’d pause while speaking” line of thought, which is a good general guideline, but not necessarily grammatically correct.
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
Read yours with the clause you create removed
You’d be missing an antecedent. That feels more wrong.
I don’t even enjoy grammar, damn it!
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
Wrongsy, if you ask Spezza
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
by Mark Parisi on Mar 4, 2011 4:22 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I think that, should the team re-sign Anderson, whatever salary he receives won't be an overpayment
I see nothing wrong with it. You bracket the phrase “should the team re-sign Anderson” because the sentence is still fine without it.
It’s also wordy. I suggest: I think that, if the team re-signs Anderson, no salary is too high.
Oh Captain, my Captain!
The sentence wouldn't be fine without it, though
“I think that whatever salary he receives won’t be an overpayment.” gives you a pronoun with no antecedent. You’d have to have another sentence before it to clarify who “he” is referring to, like “Craig Anderson is a fartsmeller.”
Alternately, you could just write one sentence of two clauses separated by a comma. Because the first clause contains the antecedent, a second comma to “bracket” it becomes unnecessary. Does that make sense?
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
Yeah, you'd need a sentence beforehand, but I still say the way you wrote it looks wrong, regardless of whether it is or not
Oh Captain, my Captain!
Ha
Well, I don’t know what to tell you. Take it up with Strunk and White, I guess.
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
I love you for posting this
I thought I was the only person alive who felt The Elements of Style was outdated. But if you’re going to make a grammar joke…
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
you are wrong, you know...
if i were marking your paper, i would circle that sentence as being awkward. “i think that should…”
i wouldn’t care to ever point that out unless there’s already a grammar debate in progress… whiiich there is.
Awkward isn't wrong.
There are many better ways to write the sentence; I think that’s clear. But I was writing on a computer with a time limit, and hasty writing is never particularly good writing in my case.
However awkward it reads, I think the rules of grammar are on my side here. It’s unnecessary to add a comma to a clause containing an antecedent.
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
the ordering of your sentence is wrong
i don’t feel like pulling out my books to dissect the parts of the sentence with terms and definitions, but it doesn’t work. nor does it work better with a comma…
It's like the Grand Canyon, everyone should see it
I’ve only seen maybe 30 goalies play live, but he’s the only one I’ve ever seen go to town like that.
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
Please do
I’d love to know if I was seeing things or if he’s really that animated all the time
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
My thoughts on the rest
- Agreed Lessard is a waste of space, but better than bringing up someone useful from Binghamton I guess. I assume (hope) he won’t play next year.
- That Butler shot WAS ridiculous. On TV, no one really noticed what happened, it was that out of no where.
- Your hockey analysis is great, if you promise to do this for every game you attend, I will buy you tickets to every game Sens game everywhere with travel costs when I win the lottery.
- The Sens are 3-1 when I attend, including 2-0 in Ottawa.
Trying to be Erik Karlsson's agent since October, 2010.
I have been to lots of games...
It averages out to about 7 a season for all the seasons I have been a fan, so 10 years. I think I’m at about a 50% win rate. Boo lol
by Los Blancos Chicca on Mar 4, 2011 3:51 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
But the Sens are undefeated when you go to a game with us
There is that.
Trying to be Erik Karlsson's agent since October, 2010.
Although the 3-1 was this season
I have been to many more in years gone by.
Sens are 0-2 in playoff games when I go though.
Trying to be Erik Karlsson's agent since October, 2010.
Lessard taking shots whenever he has the puck
awfully reminds me of our friend Schubert. I’m sure we can fill that spot with someone skilled, or maybe he’s just there to protect our young guns?
Bahahahahahahahahaha
One of my friends (who’s a Red Wings fan, incidentally) used to love Schubert. Whenever we went to games, he’d just yell “SCHUUUUUUUUBERRRRRRT” constantly. That is the only thing I can think of when reading this status.
Lessard is here because Carkner was out and we needed some toughness, and I guess we kept him rather than trade him out for someone else because Bingo’s mad enough already.
Oh Captain, my Captain!
I don't buy this idea of protecting players with goons
- Goons don’t play on the same line as the skilled players, so they would only be able to protect them after the fact.
- If you take liberties at Spezza, and then the next shift Lessard tries to fight you…you don’t have to fight him.
I think big hits are a much bigger deterrent than fights. For example, if I took a cheap shot at Spezza, I’d be a lot more scared of Anton Volchenkov than Matt Carkner or Chris Neil.
Trying to be Erik Karlsson's agent since October, 2010.
More importantly, I don't know that Winchester and Who the Fuck is 21 need protecting that badly.
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
Well that was point #1
That the goons don’t play on the same line.
Trying to be Erik Karlsson's agent since October, 2010.
except
the idea behind it is that lessard won’t give a fuck and will toss you head first into the boards, effectively ruining your career in exchange for a 20 game suspension.. and you know why he doesn’t care? because that’s the only reason he’s on the team in the first place — to get suspended for a cheap retaliation.
What an awesome recap! These are things you pick up being at a live game. Thanks for sharing it.
by Los Blancos Chicca on Mar 4, 2011 3:48 PM EST via mobile reply actions
So awesome
I was literally going to say the same thing. Mark should be Pierre McGuire’s replacement, if McGuire joins TSN.
An Ottawa Senators fan blogging at www.silversevensens.com
by Peter Raaymakers on Mar 4, 2011 5:48 PM EST up reply actions
I would do that job
Then there’d be “bullcrap” memes instead of “MONSTER” ones.
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
Ha, thanks
I don’t know what I really picked up. I’m no scout, after all. I’m sure Clouston would give a more insightful and accurate reason for Karlsson’s struggles, for example. But I’m glad you enjoyed my meager opinion!
Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs
You may not be a scout..
But you still gave a lot of detail that can only be appreciated when seen in person. Also you described what you saw pretty well. I could picture Butler’s shooting and that’s really good. Also, I wouldn’t pick up those things haha.
by Los Blancos Chicca on Mar 5, 2011 12:03 AM EST via mobile up reply actions

by 




















