Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Amateur Mathematics Of Linsanity

Ottawa Senators have 43 games broadcast nationally for 2010-11

Looks like a decent season for the Ottawa Senators and the NHL's national broadcasters, with 43 of the Sens' 82 games this season televised nationally.

Now, I say 'nationally', but I'm not really sure that's the case. For instance, 23 games will be televised on French-language networks: RDS leading the way with 20, while their affiliate network RIS has three. In English, there will be 18 games on CBC, ten on TSN, and two on TSN2. Naturally, no Sens games will be telecast on Versus or NBC, because Americans have no desire to watch the Senators at all (sorry, Mark). (Also, these televised games add up to more than 43 because some games are broadcast on both English and French-langauge networks.)

Hopefully Sportsnet, Rogers, or some other local networks pick up the remaining 39 games in the season schedule.

Comment 22 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Ian Mendes tweeted a while back that 40 games would be on the regular Sportsnet East this season, with this new beast Sportsnet ONE picking up the remainder (which would be as many as 15).

Add up the numbers and you’ll get to more than 82, and that’s because, again, of the language situation. All of the Sens games are expected on TV in English this year, with some double-up broadcasts, as you note, in French on RDS and RIS.

Note, though, that Sportsnet ONE isn’t yet available through any provider other than Rogers (and even then it’s only available on digital cable, not analog). So if Bell, Shaw and other cable companies don’t work out a deal with Rogers to carry the station, then people without Rogers might have to go to a friend’s place or a bar to catch the game. My understanding is that even Centre Ice won’t make the games available to people without ONE.

Here’s Rogers’ press release about the situation from a few weeks back: http://www.channelcanada.com/Article4872.html

by dzuunmod on Aug 25, 2010 3:22 PM EDT reply actions  

After thinking on it for a minute, I see that the math looks like this:
-18 on CBC
-10 on TSN
-2 on TSN2
-40 on Sportsnet East
-12 on Sportsnet ONE

And that gets us to 82. That’s what you can probably expect in terms of English TV this season, once the schedules are finalized.

by dzuunmod on Aug 25, 2010 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, thank you for the intelligent insight

I hadn’t seen that, so that answers those questions.

I, for one, have Rogers digital cable, so I won’t be too concerned about SN ONE, at least not from a selfish perspective. Sorry for everyone else, though…

by Peter Raaymakers on Aug 25, 2010 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pre-season

Also, TSN’s schedule (which is now up online) indicates that two pre-season games will go on TSN as well: Wednesday, September 22nd @ Toronto and Tuesday, September 28th vs Buffalo (in Dundas, Ontario).

http://tsn.ca/nhl/feature/?fid=29181

It’s a little weird I think that Dundas was chosen as the site of a pre-season game through CBC’s Hockeyville contest, and then TSN will actually show the game, but whatever.

by dzuunmod on Aug 25, 2010 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sweet, three exhibition games on TV? Nice!

by Peter Raaymakers on Aug 25, 2010 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Plus a fourth, maybe

According to dzuunmod’s link, above, SportsNet One will announce a pre-season game as well.

I guess I don’t watch enough TV because this is the first I’ve heard of this new super-channel. Apparently they only lauched last week, and can be found on Rogers Cable 394 in standard-def, and 395 & 584 in HD.

Way to keep your new product a secret, Rogers. And couldn’t you have found a spot in the low 70s? Maybe bump Game Show Television to some other channel?

by Spezzal Teams Playa on Aug 25, 2010 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I've never watched it

I didn’t even realize it was launched yet. But it’s just like TSN2, another way for the network to broadcast more games, and get more advertising revenue, without really adding too much in terms of costs.

by Peter Raaymakers on Aug 26, 2010 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

I wonder what their ad rates are on Channel 395

It takes me 28 minutes just to surf my way up to channel 90, where I invariably stop and watch the final scene of The Office, before returning to see what’s on CTV and CBC in the next half-hour.

If the price is anything like what PPP paid to deface the Sens page on Hockey-Reference, we should start a fund to produce and televise ads for the site on Sportsnet One.

by Spezzal Teams Playa on Aug 26, 2010 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

I've never actually been there

But I am aware of that online radio station called Maliboom-boom.

With enough saturation over a short period, maybe you could target a new audience for this site that otherwise wouldn’t have bothered to search for it.

I suggest casting Jamaican spokesmen. Everybody likes Jamaicans.

by Spezzal Teams Playa on Aug 26, 2010 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Way to keep your new product a secret, Rogers. And couldn’t you have found a spot in the low 70s? Maybe bump Game Show Television to some other channel?

Oh, it’s not even about that. This is a pissing match between Rogers and Bell (which effectively owns TSN) that goes back to the launch of TSN2. At that time, TSN2 launched with a little NHL content and some Raptors games as the marquee events, and Rogers was the last cable carrier in the country to pick up the channel, which prompted weeks and months of angry letters to both sides, and bad publicity mostly to Rogers for not picking up the channel.

Now, they’re just trying to do the same thing to Bell, except they’ve gone about it in a worse way: they took Jays games that were scheduled to be on regular Sportsnet and announced, a couple of weeks before the games themselves, that they’d be moved to SN ONE. And that the customers who don’t have access to SN ONE could go screw themselves. So Jays fans who don’t have Rogers (which is basically everyone not in Ontario) have been pretty worked up about the whole thing.

But it’s nothing compared to what’s going to happen when it dawns on people out west where I am (where Rogers isn’t even an option), that SN ONE is going to be airing 10 games each for the Oilers and Flames and 15 Canucks games.

Unless Shaw and the other big cable companies out here agree to carry the channel in time for the season, there will be zero ways for local fans of those teams to see the games. People will be marching with torches and pitchforks on their local Rogers Video and Rogers cellphone stores (which we do have out here).

by dzuunmod on Aug 26, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

I had no idea that Rogers' delayed providing TSN2 to Ontario

But I do find it odd that they would grant them a relatively good slot (channel 98, as well as the high 300s/low 400s, where all sports are grouped together).

So far, the only slot for SN-1 is 394, while SNE, SNO, SNW and SNP are all grouped together from 74-77, and from 402-405.

Basically, until they put SN-1 on channel 73, it remains buried on only one channel (HD not included), while TSN2 can be found on channel 98 and 407. If they really wanted to be pricks about it, they could move TSN from 30 to 97 (next to TSN2) and free up space for all 5 Sportsnets next to their main slot at channel 27.

I don’t know what goes into the decision to place a network on a specific channel, but it seems to me that the lower the number, the better. It’s the same philosophy as naming your company AAA Plumbers to get listed first in the Yellow Pages.

Does Shaw own any specialty channels that they could use to negotiate with Rogers for cheaper access to SN-1?

by Spezzal Teams Playa on Aug 26, 2010 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

One more thing I'm noticing:

CBC is airing every Saturday Sens game on the schedule this season. In past years (maybe even last year if I remember right?) there were one or two Saturday Senators games that CBC simply didn’t air either regionally or nationally, and because CBC has Saturday night exclusivity in Canada, it meant that no other network was able to pick them up, so fans were totally shut out of those games.

Not this year. Good move by the Ceeb. Edmonton, Calgary and Vancouver all have one Saturday game each this season that CBC isn’t showing, although they are all afternoon games, and I’m not sure whether CBC’s exclusivity window only starts at 7pm or if it starts earlier.

Ok.
/is a sports media geek

by dzuunmod on Aug 25, 2010 4:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Anyone tried Game Center Online?

Center Ice was a huge waste of money for us last year. Any games on CBC Ottawa or Sportsnet East were considered “national broadcasts” and therefore not available on Center Ice. We already had access to TSN, TSN2, and the occasional game on Sportsnet, so the extra money spent on Center Ice got us Maybe a dozen extra games all season. Outside of hockey we really don’t watch a lot of tv, so paying for timeshifting just to get the eastern channels on TOP of Center Ice fees was just a little much.

So since we spent most of the year watching online feeds anyway, we thought maybe we’d give the “legal” alternative a try this year. Anyone have any experience with Game Center? Mostly I want to know if their schedule is the same as Center Ice…. no way am I paying for a service that STILL won’t let me watch games that I know are being broadcast.

NHL media policy makes me sad :(

by djnine21 on Aug 26, 2010 2:08 AM EDT reply actions  

I enjoyed having GameCentre last year. Yeah sometimes the restrictions were frustrating but I like to watch more than just Ottawa and it was nice to be able to watch a lot more west coast games. It depends on whether you enjoy watching any hockey at all or only your favourite team.

I am AWESOME! Are you?

by Manthong on Aug 26, 2010 6:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

What about the other features I've heard about

Other than streaming live feeds, doesn’t GameCentre offer a shit-load of cool stuff, from classic games to massive amounts of data and stats and shit?

I’ve thought about buying it for other reasons than access to live games. I’ve just heard so many complaints about blackouts on CenterIce and GameCenter.

by Spezzal Teams Playa on Aug 26, 2010 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

First and foremost, I want to be able to see as many Sens games as I can… I kind of have no life like that. :( Basically, if the Sens are playing and there are cameras in the building, I usually wanna watch it.

After that I watch other games/teams as the mood strikes – which is frequently, but I find that the general offerings on my basic cable (TSN/TSN2/CBC/Sportsnet West) are enough to satisfy my “other hockey” needs.

Too many times last season I found myself not able to watch Sens games – not once did I find myself fuming “gee, I can’t believe I’m missing Florida v Atlanta!” – such were the great offerings on Centre Ice :)

by djnine21 on Aug 26, 2010 7:08 AM EDT reply actions  

And for those times that I was unable to find a web feed for a Sens game I was missing, we’d tune in to Team1200. I have a soft spot for Dean and Gord, but their voices remind me of endless hours of post-game shows while stuck in the ScotiaBank Place parking lot.

by djnine21 on Aug 26, 2010 7:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

I watched tonnes of Sens games last year using http://atdhe.net/

I find ironically that since I canceled cable I actually watched more sports and actually watched what I wanted to see. I watched almost every 49ers game last year, whereas I was previously at the whim of whatever game CTV or TSN decided to show.

by modsuperstar on Aug 26, 2010 2:44 PM EDT reply actions  

I had to use atdhe for some games last year too, but I have a question: if you watch a typical NHL game using a feed from there, how much internet consumption is that? Do you have a feel for this? I mean, if I stream something on my computer for three hours, am I running through 500 megs? More? Less? I really don’t have a feel for this, and since my internet provider doesn’t offer an unlimited option, it’s something I really need to worry about!

by dzuunmod on Aug 26, 2010 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hahaha, yeah, we’ve usually got a few people in our Game Day Threads watching an online feed. Sometimes sucks for them because I ruin it by reacting when the Sens score and they see that before their delayed online feed kicks in, but it works out well for the most part. Even I had to watch a couple games streaming, and I live in Ottawa.

by Peter Raaymakers on Aug 26, 2010 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The unofficial Ottawa Senators blog

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Building a Cup Contender for Next Season!
Bosch_small
How Does Daniel Alfredsson's Season Compare to Others of the Same Age?
Small
Why is everyone so excited for Zibanajad?
Small
Would Zibanajad, Foligno and 2012 #1 Pick... get Nash???
Small
Filatov is our #1 prospect
Modsuperstar-new-avatar_small
Games in hand might come in handy
Small
Senators at the Deadline, my thoughts
Bosch_small
Big Rig 1000
Small
Leafs Taking over Sens Scotiabank Place
Small
On rumour saying that Sens targeting Ruutu of Hurricanes

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Heritage_small Peter Raaymakers

Hutz_small DarrenM

Editors

Sens_small Mark Parisi

Sens-suicidebooth_small Ryan Classic

Karlssonpoint_small Adnan

Authors

Small DaveYoung

Small Varada

Bobby__small bobbykelly