Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Ten Worst Swings Of The 2011 Season

Senators have no answer for Penguins' big guns, lose 4-2

Let's face it: The Pittsburgh Penguins outplayed the Ottawa Senators tonight.  They didn't need help from the officiating crew to win this game, but they got it anyway.  It was a game where Nick Foligno could be tackled - literally - on the ice not once, but twice, with no call, but a clean Chris Neil hit on Evgeni Malkin results in a roughing call on Neil and a game misconduct call on Jarkko Ruutu.  Malkin's retaliatory whack at Neil was not called.  It was a game where Matt Cooke took a run at Peter Regin and only got two minutes for boarding; Erik Karlsson would negate this call with a stupid slash 27 seconds later. 

Those are the excuses... and none of them matter.  Take those poor calls away and Ottawa still loses this game.  Pittsburgh beat them to loose pucks. Pittsburgh won the battles for possession.  Pittsburgh clogged the shooting and passing lanes.  Pittsburgh made Ottawa dump the puck and then negated their forecheck.  Ottawa had their chances.  They didn't bury them.  Pittsburgh did.  End of story.

Who's going to step up?  Peter Regin can't do it all himself. 

Who's going to step up?  Daniel Alfredsson?  Kneeing Brooks Orpik isn't going to get it done, Alfie.  That's bush league crap, and you're the team captain.  You have to play better than that and you don't have to look further than Sidney Crosby to see what to do with your frustrations: You make the other team pay. 

Who's going to step up?  Jason Spezza?  Shoot more, kid.  Now is not the time to pass. 

Who's going to step up?  Mike FisherMatt Cullen?  One goal is a start.  Can you do it again?  We need you.  We need you all.

Star-divide

Put the panic button away:  Reality check, Sens fans. You're only down one game against the defending champs.  A few trickling pucks land differently and it's a one-game lead for the Sens. Anyone who gives up or writes off this team at this point is the most fair-weather of fans.  The playoffs aren't some video game where you win 16 in a row by an average of four goals.  It's about endurance, and losses don't mean a thing until you have four of them.

Hey, shut up: Hi, did you spend your money on playoff tickets to boo?  If so, please contact me and either give me your tickets or the money you spent on them.  It's been more than a year since you've sat inside that building for a game like this.  And you boo Jason Spezza for a few bad passes?  Shut up.

Sens Killers:  Evgeni Malkin, Sidney Crosby

They were really good.  I suspect that they used their shadowy NHL government connections to somehow read my "Who's going to step up?" rant and used it to pump up for this game.  Crosby looks unstoppable out there.  The Sens need to start hitting him - hard - and take their chances on the penalties those hits might entail.  The current plan is not working out so well.

Hey, shut up too:  Peter Regin kicked it in.  Yeah, he was trying to kick it onto his forehand.  No, it doesn't matter what he intended.

Sens Zeroes:  Andy Sutton, Matt Cullen

Sutton looked slow out there and not very physical.  He must perform better and play on the borderline, because that's where he's at his best.

Cullen turned in one of the weaker two point performances I've seen.  He, like many other players, was simply trying to do to much instead of playing Clouston's system.

Hey, shut up part three:  Don't call for a suspension of Matt Cooke, regardless of how much of a thug he is.  It's the playoffs.  Let them play.

Sens Hero:  Peter Regin

Seems to be the only guy on the top two lines that gets it right now.

Shot chart:


Ecqf_game_3_shots_medium

 

Game Highlights:


Comment 82 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Harsh recap!

Perhaps not unwarranted.

I, on the other hand, loved Alfie’s bush-league play, and thought Sutton had a pretty good game, too—especially in the third.

by Peter Raaymakers on Apr 18, 2010 10:30 PM EDT reply actions  

One might say I was displeased with the way the team unraveled after the Neil/Ruutu penalties

The let the game go from tight checking to freewheeling. That’s not the system.

As for Alfie, he’s the captain and he can’t lose his cool. He has to lead by example, and kneeing a guy won’t get you a goal.

Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs

by Mark Parisi on Apr 18, 2010 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed on Alfie. Dumb move by him.

Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.

by DarrenM on Apr 18, 2010 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also, good point on freewheeling

I think that my whole theory of Sens not getting outplayed stems from how good they were for the first half. They ended up letting it become too much of a back and forth match, though, which was scary.

Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.

by DarrenM on Apr 18, 2010 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, they can't go back and forth with this team.

At least.. not without Michalek and Kovalev in there

Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs

by Mark Parisi on Apr 18, 2010 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who do you pull for Kuba? Carkner?

I don’t think fewer physical defensemen is what the team needs right now.

Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs

by Mark Parisi on Apr 18, 2010 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

It'd probably be Campoli still, despite his good play. Maybe Carkner though

At this point if Kuba is ready to go at any point in the series, you put him in. Yes the series is physical but our biggest struggle right now is offense and Kuba is big upgrade from either Campoli or Carkner in that regard.

Strong physical play in our own end is obviously crucial, but as is the offense is lifeless, they need Kuba

Cannot play with 'em, cannot win with 'em, cannot coach with 'em. Cant do it.

by Andrew J on Apr 19, 2010 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Also, killer recap, agree 1000%

Cannot play with 'em, cannot win with 'em, cannot coach with 'em. Cant do it.

by Andrew J on Apr 19, 2010 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Tough call, but Kuba would need to come in

Carkner and Campoli have both been playing well, but you could take either out. I would probably pull out Carkner, because Campoli’s been solid and although I agree we need physicality, Carkner hasn’t exactly been throwing his weight around.

by Peter Raaymakers on Apr 19, 2010 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Aside from the "hey, shut up" parts, I disagree with your recap

1) I don’t think the Penguins outplayed the Senators. I think the Senators actually controlled the play and were the better team in almost everything, except where it counts — getting quality chances on net. Kudos to the Pens for their shot blocks, but the Sens should’ve had that game. How they only managed 22 shots on net is beyond me. Pitiful.

2) Matt Cullen had a fine game.

3) That’s the ugliest looking shot chart we’ve ever had, heh.

Also, it wasn’t mentioned but Chris Campoli had another quietly successful game. He’s been a pleasant surprise since the Olympic break.

Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.

by DarrenM on Apr 18, 2010 10:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Me too

and I don’t think Camps deserves a huge raise. 1M would be enough, presumably.

Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.

by DarrenM on Apr 18, 2010 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Totally with you on this

Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs

by Mark Parisi on Apr 18, 2010 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, really?

I think the shot chart tells the story tonight. I thought they were badly outplayed. Maybe I’m grouchy from the weekend I had. It seemed to me that everyone (especially Cullen) was in the wrong place at the wrong time trying to make the wrong play, and I credit the Pens’ scheme for that.

Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs

by Mark Parisi on Apr 18, 2010 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I thought they were badly outplayed.

We weren’t. We controlled most of the play and were cycling like crazy. Just couldnt finish anything and that is the bottom line. I have a feeling a Michalek or Kovalev would have really helped. When we didnt finish, the Pens punished us with speed and nice breakout passing. This resulted in more pressure on our D and Elliot…the rest is history.

by sens_24 on Apr 20, 2010 1:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good recap!

Alfie and Spezza have been non factors so far. Spezza has actually been a – with his no look passes that do nothing but help Pitt clear the puck and ram it down our throats at the other end. 100% correct, Regin can’t do it by himself. I don’t know how many times I yelled at the tv saying “where is your urgency”. That in a nutshell is why we will most likely lose this series.

by SENSGUY1 on Apr 18, 2010 10:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Agreed with it all.

I hated the reffing, but the Senators still got outplayed. It’s the fans’ job to get angry and throw tantrums and pout. It’s not the players’ job.

I’ve watched the replay on the 3rd Penguins goal a few times, and I still say Cooke severely hindered Elliott’s ability to move laterally. Take that away and it’s still 3-2.

I’m angry, but I’ll be here on Tuesday night, ready to go. And not just because I’m recapping.

SNAAAAAAAAAKE!!! - As seen briefly that one time on Hockey Night in Canada - Silver Seven - Cycle Like the Sedins

by Ryan Classic on Apr 18, 2010 10:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Well, when we wake up tomorrow it will still only be 2-1

A win on Tuesday and the series is tied 2-2. I haven’t seen anything that makes me think Ottawa can’t beat Pittsburgh… I just don’t know if the players are willing to do what it takes.

Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs

by Mark Parisi on Apr 18, 2010 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Our goaltending can't cut it...

Sorry folks, I know we have no other options, but Elliott isn’t cutting it. He looked terrible on the first two goals of the game and has given up a bad first goal in all three of his starts. He doesn’t have it. Neither does Leclaire….the search for a goalie continues.

It’s amazing we’re even in this series considering how invisible our top players have been.

by Dr. Hansum B. Wunderful on Apr 19, 2010 12:17 AM EDT reply actions  

Elliott stopped as many pucks as Marc Andre Fleury tonight

Yes, the first goal was Elliott’s fault, but you know what? The Cullen goal was Fleury’s fault. The Regin goal on Game 2 Fleury should’ve had. His team, however, is still winning the games for him.

Elliott wasn’t the problem tonight. The Crosby goal goes in on any goalie, Guerin’s was a breakaway, and do you really fault him for Malkin’s goal? That was poor defensive (mainly from Karlsson).

I don’t blame Elliott at all so far this series. He’s held up his end of the bargain, as far as I’m concerned.

Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.

by DarrenM on Apr 19, 2010 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

So...

You consider letting a weak goal in as the first goal in each of the first three games as “held up his end of the bargain”. Saying that he’s sucked as much as Fleury has isn’t really a compliment and more of an indictment to how the Sens haven’t been able to get many shots at his sieve-like self.

Like Ryan Classic said, imagine a goalie like Craig Anderson playing for the Sens tonight? That’s the type of goaltending you need if you’re going to defeat the Stanley Cup Champions. Elliott can’t be faulted on any of the other goals but like Clouston likes to say when he’s throwing Pascal under the bus: “You need your goalie to make a save”. His terrible GAA may be a result of poor defensive play in front of him, but NHL goalies are supposed to be able to bail their teammates out when they make a mistake.

The “well, he’s as bad a Fleury” excuse isn’t going to get this team very far. I’m not singling out Elliott as they are losing as a team right now, but I think its fair to say that he’s looked subpar thus far as a playoff goalie. A fear many of us had.

by Dr. Hansum B. Wunderful on Apr 19, 2010 2:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Just for the sake of argument, re: Craig Anderson

Elliott’s second-year stats: 29-18-4, 2.57 GAA, .909 SV%
Anderson’s second-year stats: 6-12-4, 3.32 GAA, .886 SV%

Anderson is almost 29-years old. He’s been drafted twice. He outplayed Tomas Vokoun last season only to still be relegated to the backup role. His journey’s been a long one, and it took years of throwing him to the wolves before he turned into the goalie he is now. He’s never won more than two games in a playoff series before. He was 0-7 in his OHL playoff career.

That doesn’t change the fact that right now Anderson is proving to be clutch right now and Elliott is not. In that regard, you’re correct.

Craig has actually shown that he can play like this all season. He’s had his ups and his downs, but he’s far and away the biggest reason why the Avalanche are in the playoffs. As an Avalanche fan, I can say that no goalie puts me more at ease when my team is down a goal than Craig Anderson. Right now he’s pulling out all the stops. You can look at Elliott this year and say you’ve seen flashes of brilliance. With Anderson, I’ve seen more than flashes.

SNAAAAAAAAAKE!!! - As seen briefly that one time on Hockey Night in Canada - Silver Seven - Cycle Like the Sedins

by Ryan Classic on Apr 19, 2010 5:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Elliott was shaky in game one, but I don't think much of the blame lies at his feet in games two or three

I mean, what is it exactly that you want him to do against Crosby there? “Make a save”? How?

Don’t tell me Elliott can’t make the big save. But we can’t simply wish for him to make a big save. His teammates are not giving him any help. What goalie would you put up against Crosby one on one and feel confident that you’d win that battle?

Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs

by Mark Parisi on Apr 19, 2010 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well....

I’m not looking for Elliott to stop Crosby or Guerin one-on-one. I am however wanting Elliott to stop Ponikorovsky on a harmless wrist shot less than 2 minutes into a game. You have no idea how deflating that goal was to an incredibly loud SBP crowd.

In Game 2, he mishandled a Letang shot that led to the Crosby goal. Sure, the Sens in front of him aren’t playing that great but they spotted him a one goal lead and a misplay by him and soft coverage by Karlsson leads to an easy tap in by Crosby.

I’m not sure why you’re bringing Crosby into this…we’ve already determined that this team can’t completely shut him down. Elliott needs to stand tall in order for this team to win. We can all see that he’s not playing as well as he did during the winning streaks. His inexperience is showing. Can he grow to be a better goalie? Absolutely. Can he do it in these playoffs? We have to hope…

by Dr. Hansum B. Wunderful on Apr 19, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Clouston's post-pracice comments...

Has everyone speculating that Leclaire might be starting Game 4….

I’m not a big fan of Elliott’s play right now but Leclaire is damaged goods. Not sure how starting him will spark the team as the team always plays terrible in front of him. And if the soft goals of Elliott are worrying CC, how is LECLAIRE going to fix that?!?

I hate to say it, but I’m wondering if CC is getting outcoached by the Burrito Boy…

by Dr. Hansum B. Wunderful on Apr 19, 2010 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't count on it

I have heard no speculation of Leclaire getting a start, and I see no reason to put much weight in any such speculation. Clouston brought Elliott to the dance, they’ll keep dancing together until Elliott completely falls off.

The speculation I’ve heard is Cheechoo and Donovan. One of them, or possibly both of them. Don’t expect a change on defence or in net, unless Kuba is ready to return.

by Peter Raaymakers on Apr 19, 2010 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's all the Team 1200 was yammering about

And you know Don Brennan is running to his computer to write some clap trap about Leclaire needing to start…

That being said, I think Elliott starts Game 4. Another soft goal or two and Pascal “The White Flag” Leclaire starts Game 5.

Also Peter, Clouston is pretty easy to read, the minute he starts talking about goaltending, you know the gears in his head are starting to think “change”. There’s never anything cryptic about CC.

Interesting day on Tuesday…Sens hockey..gotta love it!

by Dr. Hansum B. Wunderful on Apr 19, 2010 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

One more thing: SBP still playing 'Song 2' after playoff goals?

Christ, that’s just embarassing. Memo to Glen Gower: It was a stupid song in 1998 and its that much worse now. This is not what fans mean when they say they want tradition.

Get a goddam clue, please and thanks.

Cannot play with 'em, cannot win with 'em, cannot coach with 'em. Cant do it.

by Andrew J on Apr 19, 2010 12:51 AM EDT reply actions  

agreed!

Christ! I could do a better job than those tools, by myself, with a banjo with 2 strings and a old tin bucket.

by High Priest of Alfie on Apr 19, 2010 2:34 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

So you'd just play Cotton-Eye Joe all night?

SNAAAAAAAAAKE!!! - As seen briefly that one time on Hockey Night in Canada - Silver Seven - Cycle Like the Sedins

by Ryan Classic on Apr 19, 2010 5:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

i could

Play a lot of songs with a busted banjo and bucket, but no, I wouldn’t play C-EJ, only because the tards that play song 2 also play C-EJ too often.

by High Priest of Alfie on Apr 19, 2010 10:29 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I have no problem with this

There are plenty of other crappy songs played, but Song 2 is fine with me.

by Peter Raaymakers on Apr 19, 2010 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yep

I actually like us going back to Song 2 and not having to hear a “theme song” that each player gets to choose. Half the songs the players choose suck, or are by U2, or both.

Plus, it’s far more original than the other 15 teams all using Rock and Roll Pt. 2…

by Dr. Hansum B. Wunderful on Apr 19, 2010 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rock and Roll Part 2 is a classic!

I

Cannot play with 'em, cannot win with 'em, cannot coach with 'em. Cant do it.

by Andrew J on Apr 19, 2010 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ve got no beef with it. I kinda mentally associate it with a Sens goal.

by modsuperstar on Apr 19, 2010 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed.

There are better songs to choose from, but it’s fitting enough.

I find it weird how Anaheim plays Bro Hymn by Pennywise. It’s a good song and all, but it’s about a guy’s death (or a guy’s suicide, depending on the version they use — I don’t know if it’s the original or “tribute”). Just seems kind of weird.

Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.

by DarrenM on Apr 19, 2010 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can't say the Penguins outplayed the Senators.

I can’t bring myself to conclude that. So many times I saw a red cycle going around and around Fleury, just to no avail. So many times I saw momentum-sapping garbage calls (Karlsson, Neil, non-calls on Foligno, the Cooke hit). Fuck. This was the most infuriating game I’ve ever watched. Matt Cooke, Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin, Brooks Orpik… Fuck them all. This series should have been good, but it’s been ruined by a pair of incompetent refs and an idiot Penguins beat reporter.

by Mike Hurley on Apr 19, 2010 2:37 AM EDT reply actions  

I've come down from my perch atop Mt. Anger, but I still am unhappy by the reffing

And you suddenly reminded me how 100 PIM man Evgeni Malkin effectively had whistle immunity for awhile there.

But it’s just a game, and Tuesday is another day and another crack at winning.

SNAAAAAAAAAKE!!! - As seen briefly that one time on Hockey Night in Canada - Silver Seven - Cycle Like the Sedins

by Ryan Classic on Apr 19, 2010 5:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

There were points

where our cycle was just dominating but we couldnt convert, then Malkin and co speed off and the pucks in the back of our net. We need to start converting or at least not get caught out

by sens_24 on Apr 20, 2010 12:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was at the game, and it was maybe a little bit closer than the score and replays imply, but there were definitely a few worrying things on display:

1) I thought that Spezza and Alfie being so completely taken out of the play had something to do with the Pens having last change. After last night we know it’s something else. They’re got their number, especially Alfie.

2) Spezza, in particular, just looks completely out of synch with everyone. At one point he went into the corner, got control of the puck, everyone was driving to the net, and he threw it back to the point but no one was there – sends it all the way back into his own zone. At several points he threw it behind him into the slot, where there was no one in red, or bobbled it and gave it away. You can see the whole team adapt to it, with no one crashing the net or skating deep. Incredibly frustrating to watch.

3) Cullen gets so many chances but has no finish. He’s good on the kill though. So, basically, he’s Antoine Vermette. Who is now sitting on the bench in the form of a $4M backup. Who lost his job to a guy who allowed 4 goals on 20 shots last night. That’s a tragic narrative arc.

4) It’s weird to see a team essentially 90ish games into the year not doing the fundamental things like crashing the net or getting it deep and chasing it.

5) Sutton was invisible for maybe the first time since he was acquired. I can’t think that’s a coincidence.

by Conrad Amenta on Apr 19, 2010 8:48 AM EDT reply actions  

Sutton being invisible doesn’t shock me. Given the Leopold hit, then 2 phantom penalty calls against him in game 2 and the reporter incident he is probably a little rattled and off his game.

by modsuperstar on Apr 19, 2010 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe those things affected him, although you’d a expect a pro to be better than that. Forget about it, move on, do your job.

Cannot play with 'em, cannot win with 'em, cannot coach with 'em. Cant do it.

by Andrew J on Apr 19, 2010 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cooke's hit

I believe Cooke only got 2 mins on the hit on Regin was that he knew he was going to get hit into the boards and he squared himself and raised his arm to protect himself just before he got hit ito them.

On a side note (or 2)… I was at the game and I never boo my team, no matter what happens… and secondly, why are there douchebags out there that have to wear their Maple Leafs jerseys to a Sens game!

by Chris Marcellus on Apr 19, 2010 9:53 AM EDT reply actions  

Maple Leaf douchebags...

That’s because that’s the only chance they can actually wear those blue rags to a PLAYOFF GAME.

by Dr. Hansum B. Wunderful on Apr 19, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Disagree!

I Disagree with a number of your points, especially re. the officiating. You were right that it was fucking terrible, but take those poor calls away and Ottawa has a very good chance of winning this game. In such a game of momentum and confidence, it only takes two corrupt officials to deflate a team, especially on their home ice! They tried to battle through it, but it simply killed them tonight. Fuck Malkin and Crosby! They’re talented alright, but they and their team mates are getting away with murder. It’s bullshit officiating that’s writing their story right now. Their dynasty is Bettman’s last last hope of finding that holy grail of big American TV network deals. It’s also demoralizing his loyal Canadian fan base. Lately I’m finding it harder and harder to be a fan of the NHL.

by Oman on Apr 19, 2010 10:06 AM EDT reply actions  

What the sens need to do to win is simple:

SHOOT THE F#$KING PUCK! I am one of the most diehard fans but I am getting sick and tired of them trying all these stupid tic-tac-toe Highlight of the Night goals, Shoot the damn puck at the net and send the big bodies in and JAM IT IN! throw Sutton in front of Fleury nobody on Pittsburgh can move him and plant him there A-la Chara days and just shoot the puck at the net.

And for GOD SAKES! FINISH YOUR CHECKS! I was at the game last night I was never more angry then seeing then skating in only to poke chekc and then turn away, You’ve got padding on and you gotta use it. Hit a body, Look for #87 and Line him up EVERY TIME HE TOUCHES IT! I don’t care if it costs a penalty I want to see Sutton, Ruutu, Carkner, Neil, SOMEBODY just hit him really f#%king hard so that he needs to think twice, and do the same to #71 He is the biggest hot head you push him a few times and he is off his game and comes after you. #29 bump h8im EVERY TIME YOU CAN! ..

We know that the NHL likes Pittsburgh and will turn the other way half the time on obvious calls, that doesn’t mean you need to start playing like you know it, Hit them and if you know your going get a penalty most likely each time you touch #87 then MAKE IT COUNT!!! Make the hit worth it so that the twominutes your sitting in that box , #87 is sitting on the bench wondering where he is.

by SmileZ on Apr 19, 2010 10:30 AM EDT reply actions  

Welcome to the blog!

It’s getting to the point where the Senators may have to bend the rules to get things going their way. We’ll see if they do.

As for the powerplay, it’s not struggling; Ottawa was 2-for-4 last night. Putting Sutton in front of the net there isn’t going to make it much better. The team just needs to make their chances count by putting them past Fleury. (Simple, right?)

by Peter Raaymakers on Apr 19, 2010 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

The PP

Has been one of the bright spots of the playoff run. Regardless of what happens in this series, we need to be happy that guys like Regin, Karlsson, Smith, Elliott, Winchester and others are getting some much needed playoff experience. The Pens in 07 got crushed by the Sens because they were young and inexperienced. The future is bright for Ottawa.

’Cept for Shannon – that kid is gonzo…

by Dr. Hansum B. Wunderful on Apr 19, 2010 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t understand why they aren’t getting a body in front and shooting.

Also, why do they never get shots from the point?

Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.

by DarrenM on Apr 19, 2010 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with you on the shooting thing SmileZ

As well as finishing the checks. Even if it may put the in a PK. But they have to be smart about it. We don’t want to give the Pens too many pp’s. They have to mark the players they wouldn’t mind taking that chance on. Just like they take their chances (although they know they won’t get called)… They are demoralizing the sens and it’s working. I didn’t think it would seeing how this team has intensity. They need to look the other way and focus. But things get personal and emotional it’s easier said than done.

by Los Blancos Chicca on Apr 19, 2010 11:52 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

And for GOD SAKES! FINISH YOUR CHECKS!

If Sutton finishes that one check on Crsoby the Pens are minus a goal. Sigh.

by sens_24 on Apr 20, 2010 12:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks

As a Pittsburgh resident and hardcore Pens fan, I find your insights surprisingly fair. Thanks for keeping it real!

by shoortbuss on Apr 19, 2010 10:58 AM EDT reply actions  

My comments

I would agree with Mark when he says the pens outplayed us. I wouldn’t say to a huge extent, but they did. The biggest thing we lacked is not capitalizing on the rebounds which the pens did.

Another thing is I found that the sens played somewhat reactive. Waiting to see what happens and then playing which gave the pens the opportunity to be the creative fast guys and leaving the sens to be the chasers.

The reffing was bad. Although I agree we most probably would have lost anyways but the reffing has been bad most of this series, which is not promising and unfair. It could break confidence and frustrate the players like we saw last night in Alfie. When they lose their cool they start being sloppy.

We have a lot of gritt on our team. We should tire these pens out early. Also I do feel alfie is playing injured and same with spezza. But they have also allowed their frustrations to get the better of them.

Anyhow I’m going to Game 4! Hopefully my positive energy will give them luck!! GO SENS GO!

by Los Blancos Chicca on Apr 19, 2010 11:43 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

No breaks for Sens

Last night’s game was supremely frustrating to watch as a Sens fan because the Pens got all the breaks and the Sens got none. Just to name a few examples there was Regin not quite getting his stick on the puck, the no-calls on the multiple Foligno tackles early in the second period when Ottawa had momentum or Cooke not getting a 10-minute misconduct to go with his boarding penalty(which allowed him to interfere with Elliott while the Pens scored one of their goals).

The Penguins never looked in charge of the game until they were well ahead and they would not have been ahead without a number of fortuitous incidents. If any one of those had gone the other way, say Regin had managed to get his stick on the puck or Fleury had missed when trying to clear the puck off his goal line, then that whole game would have changed. Additionally, the Penguins would not have had been throwing their weight around so liberally if they didn’t have the earlier non-calls as a precedent.

All that said, you have to weather bad luck in the playoffs and the Senators did not manage to do so. They will have to muster all their mental toughness and get back at it in game 4. Who knows maybe they will even catch a break…

by DW19 on Apr 19, 2010 12:17 PM EDT reply actions  

Rob D

Not sure if you’ve already read this! I just saw your reply for my pens message yesterday. I was at McLarens. I yelled at him but didn’t smash his face. You’re on crutches? You broke your leg?

by Los Blancos Chicca on Apr 19, 2010 1:20 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

You probably took the best course of action

I sprained my toe a couple summers ago and it healed funny, so I had surgery to fix it. Now there is a metal plate in my foot!

by Rob.D on Apr 19, 2010 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Turning point

Karlsson taking that stupid slashing penalty. We dominated at points in this game and were unlucky not to have more goals. We need to answer for the counter attack and not get caught out by the Pens speed. That is all.

by sens_24 on Apr 20, 2010 12:52 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The unofficial Ottawa Senators blog

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Building a Cup Contender for Next Season!
Bosch_small
How Does Daniel Alfredsson's Season Compare to Others of the Same Age?
Small
Why is everyone so excited for Zibanajad?
Small
Would Zibanajad, Foligno and 2012 #1 Pick... get Nash???
Small
Filatov is our #1 prospect
Modsuperstar-new-avatar_small
Games in hand might come in handy
Small
Senators at the Deadline, my thoughts
Bosch_small
Big Rig 1000
Small
Leafs Taking over Sens Scotiabank Place
Small
On rumour saying that Sens targeting Ruutu of Hurricanes

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Heritage_small Peter Raaymakers

Hutz_small DarrenM

Editors

Sens_small Mark Parisi

Sens-suicidebooth_small Ryan Classic

Karlssonpoint_small Adnan

Authors

Small DaveYoung

Small Varada

Bobby__small bobbykelly