Did anyone else notice how everything the sens did in game 3 was called a penalty but the pens could do anything and not receive one?
A good example of this If you look at it this way cooke hit regin from behind which he should've got kicked out of the game for instead he only received a minor penalty for , shortly after this crosby's goal came which cooke should've got a interference call on but no, Pittsburgh goal... So essentially cooke shouldn't have been in the game to begin with and there shouldn't have been a goal.
The refs stole this game for Pittsburgh, and i for one am not pleased.


There are 16 Comments. Load Now.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.