Silver Seven: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Along The Olentangy for Ohio State Fans!

The Volchenclock: Time ticking on a contract extension for Anton Volchenkov

Seconds on the Volchenclock are ticking away. The Ottawa Senators want to retain the services of the shutdown defenceman (Sens fans want him re-signed even more than that), and Anton Volchenkov wants to cash in. Can't blame Volchenkov for looking to get his money: He plays a style that takes its physical toll, and he's got to make sure his next contract gets him a nice nest-egg to put away for retirement. At the same time, the Senators need to be careful: That very style Volchenkov plays makes it difficult to commit to him long-term, because who knows when one of those shots he blocks will damage the Android irreparably.

In an interview on the Team 1200 on Monday, GM Bryan Murray said he wasn't positive about the progress that had been made in contract negotiations with Volchenkov and his agent. Murray apparently made an offer to the pending UFA, and by the sound of the interview, it wasn't met with a positive reaction. So the GM's got a decision to make: Do you keep Volchenkov through the end of the season and the playoff run--where Volchenkov is at his best--and continue to try to negotiate with him. The longer the negotiations go on, the closer July 1 gets, and the more tempting it becomes for Volchenkov to wait it out and see what kind of money he can get on the open market.

This leads us to the underlying question: Keep Volchenkov, and hope he signs so you don't lose him for nothing, or trade him before Wednesday, and maximize the value of your current asset. Not an easy choice for Murray to have to make, to be certain, but each option has pros and cons, which I'll look at after the jump.

(Read more... )

Star-divide

So what do you do, in his position? Nichols from The 6th Sens and Jeremy Milks from Black Aces each took a look at the situation, but let's take a detailed look at each scenario.

Option 1: Give the man what he wants
There's no question Volchenkov is valuable to this team. The guy blocks shots in preseason games, for crying out loud; he gives everything he has for the team that he's playing for. He won't put up many points--he's got less than 100 points over seven NHL seasons--but his contributions without the puck are valuable. So you sign him to what he wants, probably a deal in Mike Komisarek-range, a five-year contract worth $22.5M, and you make it work.

Option 2: Keep him
Hold on to Volchenkov. Will we get him re-signed to a contract by the time the trade deadline comes around? Seems unlikely, but there's still a few months to get into earnest negotiations. Most importantly, you hold on to a huge part of your top shutdown tandem; Volchenkov and partner Chris Phillips have shut down the best in the league night in and night out, and they do it effectively. Although the Senators are still going through an on-the-fly rebuild, the recent success of this team has demonstrated that they can compete with every team in the Eastern Conference, and would hold up well in a seven-game series against any of them.

In his time with the Senators, Murray has let three notable free agent walk away from the Senators: Wade Redden, Mike Commodore, and Cory Stillman. The first two went on to sign what have largely been seen as ridiculously inflated contracts, Redden getting $39M over six years from the New York Rangers and Commodore cashing in $18.75M over five seasons from the Columbus Blue Jackets. Stillman went on to sign a three-year pact with the Florida Panthers for $10.6M, a loss some might think was a mistake, but a contract which simply didn't fit into the Senators' salary structure. All other key unrestricted free agents have been retained: Jason Spezza, Mike Fisher, Dany Heatley, Daniel Alfredsson, Chris Neil, and Filip Kuba were all retained--some of these contracts seem like overpayments, but they tell you one thing: Murray doesn't let free agents walk away for nothing. You can be sure he'll prioritize re-signing Volchenkov, because he's made it abundantly clear that it's not his style to lose assets for no return.

The possibility of continuing negotiations through the off-season and only trading Volchenkov after they have absolutely failed, a la Jay Bouwmeester, would remain, but seems unlikely. Volchenkov is an elite shutdown defender, of that there is no doubt, but he's not nearly as highly valued as Bouwmeester; seems unlikely another team would give up an asset to gain primary negotiation rights with Android.

Option 3: Trade him

Don't take the chance: Maximize the asset right now, and trade Volchenkov while his value is at his highest, and you can hope to wrench an inflated return from a team stocking up for a playoff run. Acquire some other defenceman to fill the void as a shutdown defender for the time being, and hope that one of Jared Cowen, Matt Carkner, or some darkhorse prospect steps up to fill the void--or sign a cheaper-than-Volchenkov defensive defenceman to round out the top six.

Trading Volchenkov would have to bring decent value for the Senators, given the two trades we've seen since the roster thaw: Both Jordan Leopold (to the Pittsburgh Penguins -- read more) and Denis Grebeshkov (to the Nashville Predators -- read more) brought second-round picks back to their original teams, and Volchenkov is a step above them. With that in mind, he should bring in a first-round pick or a very strong prospect.

There are a few shutdown defencemen on the market, none of whom are as strong as Volchenkov, but some of whom might be able to fill in for a playoff run. The Senators have been rumoured to have been talking about Aaron Ward, and they can just ask the New York Islanders for Brendan Witt (although they might have to ask nicely). One of the most interesting rumours, though, comes out of Dallas, where Stephane Robidas might be available for the right price. He's become known as a playoff warrior, and he's signed long-term: He just inked an extension for four years at a cap hit of $3.2M per season, likely the kind of numbers he'd like to get Volchenkov to agree to. I'm skeptical about whether or not he's actually available, but the rumours are out there, and if there's any merit to them you can be pretty sure Murray's identified him as a possible stand-in for Volchenkov. You might be curious of why the Senators would trade Volchenkov to acquire Robidas, but there are reasons: Volchenkov's contract status makes him more attractive to cap-crunched teams making a big run, while Robidas' contractual obligations might make him slightly less attractive--unless that's the exact contract you're looking to fit under your salary cap, and the exact role you're looking to fill on your team.

*****

So... what's your choice? My vote is to hold on to the guy for the playoffs, even if you risk letting him walk away. Would it seem bad if the Sens get ousted early, and then let Volchenkov walk for nothing? Absolutely, but Ottawa's got some good defencemen in the system, and Volchenkov's 27 years old and not getting any younger. Volchenkov gives us our best chance this season, and if you hold on to him, Murray gets plenty more time to continue negotiating with him on a reasonable extension. But hey... Murray gets a lot more money than I do to make these decisions, so he'll do whatever he likes to balance the current and future needs of the organization.

Poll
You're the general manager: What do you do with Anton Volchenkov?
Pay him what he wants; we need him around, for just about any price
65 votes
Hold on to him for the playoffs, stick to your guns on a contract, and risk letting him walk away
88 votes
Trade him right now: Get someone to fill in for the playoffs, and don't lose Volch for nothing
88 votes

241 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 19 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Since the lockout

Ottawa has seen both Redden and Chara walk for nothing. It would be very tough to witness another valuable asset on the blueline get lured out of Ottawa over the offseason, even more so if Volchenkov, like Chara, signs with a divisional rival. Our powerplay shoots once in a blue moon as it is; imagine Android foiling our pp point shot attempts multiple times a season! I can’t bear the mental image. And just think of the amount of picks and prospects we’ve passed up in letting the aforementioned ex-sens guys walk…

It just blows that the Mark Gandler of 2010, the Scott Boras of the NHL if you will is handling this one. What is it with Russians in this town picking the most outrageous player agents?

So to address your question, its a toss up between maximizing the teams value this season, and minimizing payroll moving forward. I think that if before the deadline, we’re able to sign him for a shorter term contract, do it, almost regardless of the price. However, a longer term deal is not wise at any dollar amount given his style of play. If I’m GM and he’s asking for anything beyond 3 years, I may just lean towards trading him for a 1st round pick, and acquiring an expensive rental or two to plug the gaping hole on d.

by LeTigre on Mar 2, 2010 9:22 AM EST reply actions  

I'm really surprised at the voting

People must still be stinging from losing Chara. Do the “trade him” voters not realize that we can’t win in the playoffs without Volchenkov? This man blocked 11 shots against the Capitals, people! That included something like six of Ovechkin’s.

Do you really want to gamble our playoff fortunes on Elliott or Leclaire saving seven Ovechkin shots a game? I don’t. There’s no player we can get who can “fill in” for Volchenkov. He’s never going to be Norris contender, but he still has a skill set that can’t be replaced by anyone in our organization currently.

Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs

by Mark Parisi on Mar 2, 2010 11:13 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

This.

Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.

by DarrenM on Mar 2, 2010 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Also surprised

I was surprised also and think the organization should keep him around through playoffs even if it means losing him to Free agency. However, for arguments sake, does your stance change depending on what happens during the trade deadline. Quickly I come up with the three scenarios…

1) The team can get no defensive help at the deadline: Is the current roster good enough to win the cup this season? Maybe but it seems like a reach without some defensive depth. If Murray is unable to get any defensive help, does he then decide getting something for Volchenkov is better than failing in the playoffs and losing him for nothing?

2) The team gets moderate help defensively with a low 2nd pairing to 3rd pairing defenseman who may have some desired characteristics (cup winner, experience etc): With some added depth I think there is a better shot at the cup and the reward becomes greater to hanging onto Volchenkov for a playoff run.

3) The team does something miraculous and lands a top 4 defenseman without completely destroying the roster: This is where it may get tricky. Initial reaction would think that with a top 4 defenseman, the Sens should keep Volchenkov and make a serious cup run. Losing him to free agency would also sting less if they could keep whoever they aquire at the trade deadline beyond this year. However, maybe with an added defenseman, Murray can also trade Volchenkov, ensuring he gets something for him and with the added defenseman through trade, the Sens could still make a decent playoff run.

Personally I hope the two sides can work something out that isn’t detrimental to the team and isn’t also a slap in the face to Volchenkov but at the very least, I don’t envy Murray’s position at the moment.

by DigitalDreamer on Mar 2, 2010 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, Murray is not in a position of strength here at all

I don’t think he has the players to meet the price of a top 4 defenseman right now. I would love to get one to pair with Karlsson, but not at the cost of the future of the organization.

The real roadblock here is Kuba. He is being paid like a high-end top 4 defenseman but not remotely playing like one. The bloat of his $3.7M has totally handcuffed the team. If he were playing like he was paid to play, we wouldn’t be talking about making any additions to this team.

Murray’s best plan, in my opinion, is to pay Volchenkov whatever (unless he wants $5M or more) and trade Kuba in the offseason when his NTC expires. What we get in return for him is irrelevant. If Cowen makes the team, Kuba won’t be missed at all, and Murray is free to sign a lesser free agent with the remaining money he’s saved on dumping Kuba.

Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs

by Mark Parisi on Mar 2, 2010 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Yup

There’s no doubting Kuba is overpaid/underacheiving… he’s the Wade Redden of 2010. Would love to see him unloaded after the year… there always seems to be a market for big offensively minded soft d-men for some reason.

Ideally Murray signs Volchenkov for < 4.5 million, and </= 3 seasons. If it makes him feel any better, he can consider the added salary an additional investment into goaltending.

by LeTigre on Mar 2, 2010 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I was about to crap all over Murray about over paying Kuba last season, but then I took a look at his career stats. Last year was a career year for points, but not a substantial jump. He’s put up 30-40 points the last 3 seasons and will do so again this year. His PP points are down substantially this season, but otherwise he’s pretty much performing at his career average pace offensively, which is pretty solid considering he is 34 years old. His plus minus is -8 between this year and last, but scratch the recent Caps and Leafs games he’d only be -2.

The guy was good enough to make his country’s Olympic team. Sure Kuba has played soft, but I also think on this site we micro analyze our defense a bit too much. Looking at the other teams in our division Kaberle, Chara and Tyler Myers have higher point totals then Kuba, and Kuba missed 12 games so far this season.

I’m not saying Kuba doesn’t deserve some scrutiny, but maybe we judge him a little too harshly given how close we follow the team.

by modsuperstar on Mar 2, 2010 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Kuba does take a lot of flak around here

Frankly, he does deserve it, simply based on his salary, but as for Murray signing him… I don’t think that was necessarily a bad move. Looking at the landscape for defensemen, Murray knew he wasn’t going to be a player in the big name sweepstakes. Essentially, he had no guarantees he would be able to get anyone as good as Kuba, and Kuba was solid last year.

I would have preferred that he was traded last year, but I could understand the logic of the signing, especially watching free agency play out afterwards. The fact that Kuba has underperformed this year is not Murray’s fault. The fact that he has a No Trade Clause is.

Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs

by Mark Parisi on Mar 2, 2010 1:57 PM EST up reply actions  

You might very well be right there

The guy looks awful: He moves slowly, he can’t check, and he seems to be lost in the defensive zone. But he puts up his points, he can pass the puck well, and he’s decent (oddly enough) on the penalty kill.

At the time, I was disappointed and surprised Kuba was re-signed; I was expecting a good return to put towards our rebuild. Still, looking at how weak our defence was for so much of this season, Murray did what it took to re-sign one of few bona fide NHL defencemen we had on the team. At the time, he didn’t know Carkner or Karlsson would be able to play up here, and neither Picard nor Campoli were great last season. He didn’t want to overpay greatly on the open market, so he overpaid slightly to keep the guy around.

by Peter Raaymakers on Mar 2, 2010 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

We also have to remember...

it doesn’t necessarily have to be “CUP OR BUST.”

The Senators organization will be happy just to win a round or two in the playoffs, because there’s huge revenue to be had and it will help sell season’s tickets for next year.

Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.

by DarrenM on Mar 2, 2010 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe not for the organization but it might be Cup or Bust for Alfredsson!

by DigitalDreamer on Mar 2, 2010 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

True,

but that doesn’t mean the Senators should bankrupt their future for this year, heh.

Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.

by DarrenM on Mar 2, 2010 12:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Great work Peter

I was previously in the “trade him if you can’t sign him” boat, but I really don’t think Ottawa can do anything in the playoffs without him. David Pagnotta at The Fourth Period suggested that Ottawa simply treat Volchenkov as a free rental — a guy that will help you for a great playoff run that you don’t have to give up assets to get.

It’ll sting to lose Anton for nothing, but it’ll also sting to get bounced in the first round. It’ll also be hard to get much for Anton, since he’s a UFA and might be treated as a rental by other teams (unless they can agree to terms with him).

Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.

by DarrenM on Mar 2, 2010 11:13 AM EST reply actions  

My thoughts exactly

Silver Seven - The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators Blogs

by Mark Parisi on Mar 2, 2010 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Is this team really worth it though? I don't think so

Good as they’ve played I still think there’s too many question marks on defence, offence and in goal to consider them legit contenders.

Murray seems to think we have a good enough chance to gamble away two 2nd-rounders and now potentially let Volchenkov walk for nothing, but I think assuming Cullen and Sutton are the difference between what we had in January and a cup appearance is idealistic.

Murray’s previous moves to pick up defencemen have generally been awful, so the present situation doesnt inspire much confidence.

Cannot play with 'em, cannot win with 'em, cannot coach with 'em. Cant do it.

by Andrew J on Mar 2, 2010 7:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Is it time to learn from other pro sports?

Why wait until the last year of a contract to negotiate with a player ? All the leverage starts to move to the player from the team- especially if subject player has a good year. The key to avoid crises is to look ahead a bit and get the long term deal done in the 2nd last year of a contract.

Murray needs to get phillips and volchenkov signed so why not try to do that this summer? if he can’t get philips signed to a career close out deal, then he has the summer to deal him for player and or prospects.

I love Volchenkov’s heart and toughness yet I have trouble with a steady defensive guy for more than $4 or 5M.

In this business, the Sens can’t afford to let talented players skate away for nothing… so sign long term in the summer or trade. We would get more for a player with a year left than a 2 month rental

This seems to be a pretty good practice in baseball – look what the Jays got for Doc Holiday (lots of propects)

by Senz on Mar 3, 2010 10:21 PM EST reply actions  

HNiC said he'd been tendered a 5 year deal and turned it down

Beginning to look like you won’t sign him. Probably best you can do is use him for a tradeup on or before the first day of the draft. BTW as to the suggestion about Witter, I am assuming it was a joke. Witter is Grapes’s favorite player and he’s good at stopping Yukons. He really is not an NHL-level defenseman anymore unfortunately. You got a super deal on Andy. Next to Streit, he was our best defenseman this year, although Hillen and Andy Mac have been good.

by BCISLEMAN on Mar 14, 2010 6:17 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.
Start posting about the Senators »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

SBNation.com Recent Stories

PHILADELPHIA - MAY 16:  A fan of the Philadelphia Flyers holds up a sign reading "Next Goalie" behind goalie Carey Price #32 of the Montreal Canadiens in Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Finals during the 2010 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at Wachovia Center on May 16, 2010 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

Habs Finally Lock Up Carey Price, Sign Goalie To Two-Year Deal

National Hockey League commissioner Gary Bettman answers questions during a pre-game media availability before the Pittsburgh Penguins season opener against the New York Rangers in a NHL hockey game in Pittsburgh, Friday, Oct. 2, 2009. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar) +25 updates

Ultimatum? NHL Reportedly Threatens To Toss Out Kovalchuk, Luongo Deals Without NHLPA Concessions

Photo +1 updates

Report: Donald Fehr Hands NHLPA List Of Conditions On Becoming Union Leader

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Headshot_small Peter Raaymakers

Darrennewyears_small DarrenM

Editors

Sens_small Mark Parisi

Ryan67_small Ryan Classic

Prospect correspondents

N1418112790_1611_small Crooklyn Banks

Don_cherry_small Brian Sullivan