Ottawa Senators mid-term report card: Defence and goalies
We're a little ways past the mid-way point of the season, but we've got a good opportunity to look back on the first half of the season and grade the performance of the Ottawa Senators so far. As a team, Ottawa's probably surpassed quite a few expectations, and they've done it with plenty of significant injuries to significant players: Most recently, Daniel Alfredsson and Jason Spezza, but don't forget about the fairly long-term absences of Pascal Leclaire, Filip Kuba,Anton Volchenkov, Chris Neil, and a few others.
Group success aside, however, it's important to look at the individuals who are responsible for the lion's share of the Senators' current standing, and also to find out who's got to pull up their socks. The forwards got their grades yesterday, and we're dishing out some special awards early next week, but for today we'll take a look at the defence and goaltenders, starting with...
DEFENCE
It's fairly remarkable that Kuba has put up a decent number of points, considering how downright awful his play has seemed at times--especially recently. He rebounded from an early-season injury with some decent games early, but fell so far from his top form that the Senators' entire defence corps has felt the reverberations of it. Kuba's expected to lead this team from the back-end with good offensive vision and solid, if not steller, defensive play; neither have been present with enough consistency so far this year.
One of the brightest spots on the Sens lineup this season has been Phillips, whose defensive play has been downright outstanding. He's among the team leaders in plus/minus despite routinely lining up against the opponent's best players, and is solid on the top penalty-killing unit. Notably, though, has been Phillips' growth offensively this season: He gets some powerplay time, and although his points are modest, he routinely makes smart offensive moves to keep plays alive and joins the rush when it's a good idea.
Android's probably playing some of the best hockey of his career right now, perhaps because it's a contract year or because it's an Olympic year, but it's definitely been a huge part of the Senators' success so far. Like Phillips, he's got a great plus/minus despite playing the opposition's best, and is also a huge part of the penalty kill. He's also well on his way to career highs in goals, assists, and points, if he keeps going the way he's going. He's also got his hits going again, and is one of few players in the league who can routinely throw a hip-check without letting opponent's get by him--his welcome-wagon hip-checks have been especially memorable. He's got 80 hits (72 hits in the league) on the year and 76 blocked shots (30th in the league), even though he's missed 14 games to injury. He almost deserves an A++, but I decided to stick with the standard grading system.
It's certainly been an up-and-down season for Karlsson, literally and emotionally. He was sent to the AHL after starting in the NHL, and was scratched for a few games recently, but it looks like it was a mistake to expect him to step into top-pairing minutes in the NHL as a 19-year-old undersized defender. Still, his improvement has been marked, and should continue as the season goes on.
Picard has earned the trust of Senators coach Cory Clouston this season, even if he's earned the hatred of a large segment of Senators fans due to his inconsistent play on the season. (Note: That's a different Alex Picard photo'd.) But he's put up decent points in limited time this season, developed some chemistry with on-again, off-again partner Matt Carkner, and when he's good he's pretty good, but when he's bad he's awful.
A lot was expected of Campoli when he was brought in last season, and he hasn't brought much of anything this season. A couple goals and only three powerplay points (1PPG, 2PPA) just isn't cutting it for the fifth-year pro. He's been benched for games, although he responded with a positive outlook on playing winger, but he's certainly got more to do going into this off-season without a contract. On the plus side, Campoli's shown flashes of the puck-mover Ottawa thought they acquired at the deadline in 2009, and he has the skills to rebound from a poor first half of the season.
Very few people thought Carkner had much of a chance of breaking the NHL roster going into the season, myself included, but he's very quickly grown into one of the fan favourites this season. He'll drop the gloves with anyone, and fares well against even the premiere heavyweights, but ensures that he doesn't unduly penalize the team by sitting in the sin bin. He's a stand-in for Phillips and Volchenkov in defensive situations, and has a decent number of points on the year considering what was expected of him. By all counts, he's far surpassed expectations.
GOALIES
Inconsistency in the Senators net was supposed to end when Leclaire joined the team, but it hasn't yet. Although he's got some great games bringing his mark up, he's also got some awful games bringing it down. Most frustrating, though, are the good games that are too often ruined by a soft, momentum-sapping goal or two. As long as he can fend off further injury, he'll get plenty of starts in the second half, and will have to find himself a rhythm if the Senators are going to stay in their playoff spot through the end of the year.
Similar to Leclaire, Elliott's had some good games--including two shutouts--but he's also had some bad games, and he's allowed far too many deflatingly soft goals to earn a good grade so far. To take advantage of any openings he may have with Leclaire struggling, Elliott's going to have to gain some measure of consistency, and work on controlling rebounds--his defence aren't helpful in clearing pucks and traffic from the front of the net, so Elliott has to suffocate defensive-zone play by covering the puck whenever possible, and can't allow more weak goals to sully otherwise good efforts.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Issues:
1) Whether this is true of all universities, or just the welfare one that I attend, but there’s no such thing as a D-. Therefore, Kuba fails.
2) Love the Picard picture.
3) Campoli Fails, but Kuba and Picard don’t? Disappointment.
I wouldn't give any of our defensemen an F
It’s hard to give an accurate grade considering that recent play is always more easily recalled, but do you not remember how dominating Picarkner was early? Just because Picard has fallen off as of late doesn’t mean he’s an F.
Kuba deserves a D, because he is simply not playing up to expectations and has not since the start of the year.
Yeah, I guess Kuba deserves a D more than a F
He’s been bad recently, but he’s not an F. I gave Campoli an F because he lost his D spot to Picard, and despite some decent games, hasn’t put up the points that he’s expected to put up. A lot of these grades are subjective to the expectations of the player rather than an objective baseline, and we expected Campoli to be a PP QB with a good first pass. He hasn’t been close to that.
by Peter Raaymakers on Jan 8, 2010 3:23 PM EST up reply actions
Definitely an ‘A’ for Carkner based purely on expectations but relative to other defence on the team I wouldnt put him nearly as close to Phillips and Volchenkov
Cannot play with 'em, cannot win with 'em, cannot coach with 'em. Cant do it.
Yeah, I should have mentioned that the grades are relative to the expectations for the player. It’s like kindergarten in that sense.
by Peter Raaymakers on Jan 8, 2010 3:23 PM EST up reply actions
Kuba is an 'F' for FAILURE
Sorry, but if you’re going to give Carkner an ‘A’ based on outperforming expectations, Kuba should be an ‘F——" (yeah, three minuses) because he’s been downright awful considering what was expected of him when he was “awarded” a cushy contract and an NTC.
Quite possibly a worse signing than anything Murray has done as GM. He is an “F” for exactly what you stated, his play is dragging down the play of others.
by Dr. Hansum B. Wunderful on Jan 8, 2010 1:18 PM EST reply actions
I don't think Kuba currently has a No Trade Clause in his contract
He had one in his old contract from Tampa Bay, but I don’t believe it was carried over and included in this extension.
NTC
Nope…Murray gave him a one year NTC with his extension. It is valid for this year and the team can dump him after July 1, 2010.
Such a BAD idea to give ANYONE an NTC these days. Why would Murray give this guy one?
by Dr. Hansum B. Wunderful on Jan 8, 2010 3:09 PM EST reply actions
Yeah, he has a limited NTC
But still, he eats a lot of minutes. I have not been impressed with his play, at all, but as bad as he’s been for the last 10 games or so, he was decent in the games before that. And he’s put up points, even if a lot of them are secondary assists. The bottom line is that he was signed as a transitional defenceman between where we were last year (in terrible shape in terms of defensive reliability and stability) and where we hope to be 3-4 years from now (in great shape defensively, with Cowen, Karlsson, Wiercioch, and all the other recently-drafted defencemen plus some of the RFAs we have for this upcoming summer). I think he’ll find the form that was respectable last season; not flashy, but solid anyway.
by Peter Raaymakers on Jan 8, 2010 3:30 PM EST up reply actions
The day Kuba was signed to that extension, he played a very good game.
And I can just picture the conversation afterwards.
Murray: “If you play like THAT every game…”
I think that's what's so frustrating about so many of our players
We’ve seen the level they CAN play at. We know they can do it, there’s just no consistency.
You know where this is going
I know Not Martin wasn’t going to get a full letter grade or that vetoed Cory Clouston Lavender Tie Award for Benchwarming Excellence, but he doesn’t even get an INC and a small writeup? This makes me sad.
Otherwise, I pretty much agree with all the grades, with the exception of Carkner. I know it’s relative to the expectations but Carkner has been frustrating for me. Sometimes it’s weak play, sometimes it’s bad penalties, and sometimes he’s really darn good. I can’t give an A to that. I’d give him an A- at best. Great for someone who wasn’t expected to be a huge force in the AHL, let alone the NHL. But still a little too inconsistent.
ryanclassic.net
I'll give Not Martin some love in the first half awards
Those will be coming up Monday. All the NHL awards, plus a few special in-house awards.
by Peter Raaymakers on Jan 8, 2010 4:44 PM EST up reply actions
Excellent. You do good work.
If I could sponsor an award, a la the Mark Messier Leadership Award, I’d definitely make the Cory Clouston Lavender Tie Award for Benchwarming Excellence.
ryanclassic.net

by

















