Fisher's hat trick powers Senators over Canadiens, 6-1 final
Looks like the Senators were saving their goals for one big outburst on Scotiabank Place ice. After only three goals for in the first three pre-season games, Ottawa scored early and often en route to a 6-1 victory over the Montreal Canadiens--and that was without Jason Spezza, Milan Michalek, or Daniel Alfredsson in the lineup.
The line of Peter Regin in the middle of Nick Foligno and Mike Fisher, the latter playing the wing in an experiment that seems to have worked upon first impression. The three combined for 11 points on the night (Fisher: 3G, 1A; Regin 1G, 2A; Foligno 4A), and routinely hemmed the Habs defenders in their zone for shifts at a time. And holy smokes, they combined for 12 of Ottawa's 23 shots: Regin had six, Fisher had five, and Foligno had a single.
The other big line was with Ryan Shannon trying his hand at centre between Alex Kovalev and Jonathan Cheechoo. Kovalev scored the opening goal short-handed and added an assist. Seems like the Shannon line would be more a 2A line, used in certain situations and with plenty of special-teams time, while the Regin line could very well pull off 2B status; a checking line stacked up against the opposition's big line, wearing them down and backchecking like the Dickens.
And those three aforementioned big guys who didn't play Saturday night would be the top line, one would assume.
(Read more... )
Ottawa's other goal came from Josh Hennessy, who has had a quiet but solid training camp so far. He played just over ten minutes in the game, mostly fourth-line minutes with Mike Hoffman and Shean Donovan. Not that he couldn't be useful in Ottawa, but I just don't see a place for Hennessy on the Sens' roster. Donovan, on the other hand, continues to be an asset to the team. He won't play much, and won't do a lot (offensively, at least) on the scoresheet, but he'll stand up for anyone and he's got to be popular in the dressing room. He stood up to a Canadien who had taken liberties with Cheechoo, and got in a fight later in the game against Ryan O'Byrne. He's cheap, he's a veteran, he's popular, and he's great in the city. Even if it means Zack Smith has to play another year in Bingo, Donovan's earned his spot.
Ottawa's defencemen played a quiet game. Erik Karlsson, who played with Filip Kuba, was pretty awesome; his skating ability is stronger than any Senators' defenceman I can recall. He's got the quickness of Joe Corvo and the fluidity of Wade Redden, plus a pretty great shot. Yeah, we all know he's undersized, but I'm sure he'll be fine once he gets a better hang of the game. Kuba was reliable, a good complement to Karlsson, and the only Sens' defenceman to notch a point in the game.
Matt Carkner surprised me with his reliability on defence. He's not quick, but he can defend just fine. Derek Smith wasn't very noticeable, but he was, again, reliable. Chris Phillips got lots of ice time (22+ minutes), including a fair shake on the powerplay, and he actually looked pretty good with the man advantage. Maybe he worked on his passing or something over the summer. Anton Volchenkov rounded out the d-corps, but he only played 12 minutes and left some time in the third (I think) with a lower-body injury. (Apparently Ottawa brass is already in playoff form in terms of injury disclosure.) Luckily, word is it's nothing too serious.
Finally, Pascal Leclaire got the whole 60 minutes, and did well with it. He wasn't consistently tested, and only faced 23 shots altogether, but there were a few times when he had to come up big for the Senators. A particular left-pad save while Ottawa was short-handed was particularly impressive, and it reassures me to know he's still got that flexibility to his game.
It was nice to see an exciting game, honestly. Reassuring, too. And the fact that there might be another option on the offence makes me happy--if other guys can't seem to find their scoring touch, maybe Regin, Fisher, and Foligno will step up, and our fate won't rest entirely on the top line.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i was expecting more from the shannon line.
unfortunately, they didn’t cash in as big as i expected. i watched the first and part of the second, so i didn’t see ever thing.
what’s was your verdict on the top line?
and if this regin line works out for the regular season. what will be of kelly?
regin’s becoming a real threat. he was strong, obviously, shown by the boxscore. kelly’s becoming a real question mark for the roster. are we talking 4th line, bench, salary dumb.
it’s to early to assume kelly is totally expendable now though.
but anyway, there was a preseason game in binghamton, held in the bcc ice center (college rink). i couldn’t make it because i had made other plans, but i read on the b-sens website that over 700 people showed up for the game. i’ve played hockey myself in there, so i can tell you they sold more tickets than there are seats.
just thought that was an interesting tidbit, great turnout for a preseason game.
Kelly is trade bait, as far as I'm concerned
His biggest asset to the team right now is his PK skills, and those just aren’t worth $2M a year. I don’t know which of the top nine forwards you’d take out to put Kelly in the lineup right now. He’s definitely not the right center (that’s right, you Canadian jerks, CENTER :) ) for Cheech and Kovie, and Regin showed sick chemistry with Foligno and Fisher after first period jitters
So, what? Put him on the fourth line? Ruutu-Kelly-Neil and call it The Millionaires? I don’t think that Kelly fits well there either, and I don’t like that that keeps Donovan out of the lineup. Murray should package Kelly, Schubert, and, yes, Shannon, for a true second line center. If not that, at least Kelly and Schubert for whatever he can get for salary cap relief, like draft picks or prospects.
It’s obvious there needs to be some moves, especially if Regin keeps playing as well as he’s been playing. That possibility leaves both Donovan and Winchester out of the lineup, which is undesirable and might actually put us over the cap (we need their smaller contracts, I think).
Only problem is, no one has any value. Schubert’s been on the block for a year now, and nothing. Shannon might have value, but he was re-signed for a reason. Kelly has likely been shopped, but still… and who wants to acquire three players like them and give up a second line centre? Most teams won’t take three ’tweeners for one good player.
by Peter Raaymakers on Sep 20, 2009 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions
Kelly V Winchester
We are talking about Kelly being the 4th line Ctr but we are missing someone who I believe could replace Kelly and that is Winchester who is also a Ctr dont forget.
Winchester last year played the PK and well, he battles on the boards and in the corners way more than Kelly and also dropped the gloves last year a few times when needed. With his battling on the board he started to get underneath the opposition players skin and his work ethic is awesome. IMHO he is the fourth line Ctr (Not Centre or Center).
I like Zack Smith or Donovan or Ruutu – Winchester – Neil as the 4th line (though 2mill for Neil on the 4th line is not good). Ruutu is now becoming expendable but I think he is only $1.3 Mill and is supposed to be a shoot out specialist.
Shootout specialist, yes
Also fun to watch, hard working, and good at getting some other players off their game. He drew a penalty last game just with his annoying nature, and it’ll be the first of many.
I continue to wonder why we re-signed Neil at any amount, let alone the huge pay raise we gave him.
by Peter Raaymakers on Sep 20, 2009 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions
More Cuts Carkner survives
Carkner survives cuts…nice! I would love to see this guy stay with the club though he may have only survived with Volchenkov injured.
I think the blue line is really interesting with Philips Volchenkov / Kuba & Karlsson (potentially) leaving Campoli (who has been less than impressive though is definitely starting as he cost us a 1st round draft pick) and Carkner, Lee, Picard (who looks to be getting worse), Schubert and Cowen who definitely needs to go down to sharpen after his near year off.
Didn’t Carkner play upfront last year in the preseason? I would keep Carkner and Lee as 6th and 7th defence men. Though according to Schubert, Clouston informed him he was very important to the club be able to play forward and back.
Carkner is not the fatest but looks solid on the back, didn’t look out of place on the PK and adds toughness to this outfit with out giving silly penalty minutes away.
i like schuburt, he's a quality player.
i hate to say it, but we need to give him a chance to succeed somewhere else. he doesn’t deserves to have a chance to play his game (which is deffinetly on d, not as a forward) somewhere his services would be appreciated.
besides, i want to see brian lee have a solidified spot on the roster, he’s a first round pick after all, and he’s very smart and solid in his own end and has shown he can contribute on offense on occasion. he’ll be consistent someday, trust me.
my word on carkner, is i’m surprised to see him playing the way he is. i mean, he’s fought down here in binghamton a few times, but he was never THAT aggressive down here. i guess he’s trying to make a statement that he can play in ottawa and bring needed grit.
i do like the way he’s playing though, i’d like to see him make the team and bring the physical game he’s been playing in offseason. we could use that in ottawa.
my opinion
CUT: Picard, Schubert, Cowen(has he signed a pro contract yet?)
KEEP: Lee, Carkner
This would leave the defense looking like this
Phillips-Volchenkov, Shutdown Pair
Kuba-Karlsson, Offensive Pair
Campoli-Lee/Carkner , Balanced Pair (offensive in campoli, defensive in lee or grit in carkner)
Looks good to me.
Were agreed
Lets email Clouston and let him know what we have decided on the blue line for the coming season.

by 





















