Sens can't handle Sharks' bite, lose 5-2
Sens' hero: Milan Michalek
Michalek clearly wanted to beat his old team, firing six shots on net -- twice as many as any of his teammates. He scored 2 goals, both of them beauties. The first was on a rush from his own end with Jason Spezza clearing him some space, while the second was a quick powerplay goal off a nice pass from Daniel Alfredsson.
Sens' zeroes: Brian Elliott, Anton Volchenkov
Elliott had his worst game of the season, allowing 4 goals (a few of them questionable). After the fourth, it looked like Clouston might throw in backup to the backup Mike Brodeur, but he let Elliott finish the night. Volchenkov clearly still had some rust in his first game back, as he failed to clear the puck on two of San Jose's goals.
Sens killers: Joe Thornton, Patrick Marleau, Dany Heatley
The Sharks' top line was dominant tonight, each of them getting two points (with Marleau scoring on each of them). Heatley played with more heart than he usually does (what I call "International Game Dany Heatley"), showed great hustle and fired off 8 shots (most in the first period). Thornton was, well, Joe Thornton -- he made great passes and was hard to move off the puck.
Good game, rookie: Erik Karlsson
Karlsson didn't have a perfect game (a defensive lapse contributed to the Sharks' second goal), but he had one of his best so far. He was a force to be reckoned with on the powerplay, getting an assist and creating chances with his crisp passes. Sometimes he takes risks that are a bit too big, but when they succeed, they certainly create nice opportunities.
Oh no, not again: Too many men penalty
Ottawa is now second in the league in bench minor penalties, thanks to their seventh tonight. This team needs to learn how to perform a line change.
Telling stat: Faceoffs, 39-22 in favour of the Sharks.
You're not going to win many games when you're completely dominated at the faceoff circle, and it's hard to do much worse than the Sens did tonight. Jason Spezza was the worst with an appalling 27%, while Mike Fisher wasn't much better at 32%.
Surprising stat: Ryan Shannon, +1
None of the Sharks' goals were scored on the powerplay, which makes it kind of amazing that anyone could be a plus player in a 5-2 loss, but Shannon was the Sens' only plus player on the night. In fact, the only other Senator that wasn't a minus player was Ryan Keller who was even (mostly because he barely played).
0 recs |
14 comments
|
Comments
So, why was Keller in and Regin out?
So the kid could play five and a half minutes? This wasn’t a game where we needed three lines. Not sure what Clouston doesn’t like about Regin’s game, but I thought we could have used him tonight.
by Mark Parisi on Dec 2, 2009 1:16 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Foligno also had limited ice time
I’d love to find out why.
by Mark Parisi on Dec 2, 2009 1:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Seems to be a trend. Clouston appears to be shying away from the four-line game in favour of a shorter bench more often than not these days.
by PeterR on Dec 2, 2009 8:14 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know either.
I think Regin should be playing. I really want to see him centring fisher and kovalev again, but i doubt that’ll happen.
Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.
by DarrenM on Dec 2, 2009 1:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
*whistles*
Sure is a shame there aren’t any comments in here.
Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.
by DarrenM on Dec 2, 2009 1:16 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Really wonder how this would've gone with a normal(er) Volchenkov and a normal Elliot
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 2, 2009 1:18 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Or Leclaire
I think the Sens could have beaten this team, but they gave the game away with some untimely penalties. If there’s a concerning pattern this season, that’s it in my opinion.
by Mark Parisi on Dec 2, 2009 1:20 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
this is something I’d write about if I hadn’t already done it twice.
Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.
by DarrenM on Dec 2, 2009 1:43 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Spezza?!?
Has anyone seen that guy who used to wear #19 and NOT be the anchor on his line?? Sweet Jeebus, I get that he’s improved his defensive game but the Sens aren’t paying $7 mill a season to have an overpriced version of Chris Kelly!
Definitely a ZERO tonight. Moreso than Elliott. The 1st and 4th (for sure) were questionable but he made some great saves and most importantly kept Dany Heatley off the board.
by Dutch Treat on Dec 2, 2009 2:34 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I don't know that he's an anchor, but he's definitely not contributing as he should be
He was pivotal on the first goal, but Spezza needs to take advantage of his scoring chances, and to start making the kind of sick passes that he’s counted on to do.
by PeterR on Dec 2, 2009 8:22 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
TSN's headline is boggling my mind:
Getting his revenge
Can someone explain this one to me? Unless it’s one of those secret reasons Murray Heatley keeps alluding to (seriously, sir, you should probably just not talk, and more than that, not talk to anyone who might talk), I have no idea what revenge Heatley would be getting.
Feeling burned by Ottawa? We feel more burned.
Not enough ice time? He had 0:35 less than average and under 20:00 total tonight.
Not being traded to a team not called Edmonton? Los Angeles didn’t want you, either.
Super Secret Reason? How about you tell us.
It’s kind of pointless to bitch and moan about a headline, but I keep being reminded about, well, how much of an ass this guy seems to be. I’d feel less inclined to grumble about it if he (and others) didn’t keep giving me reasons to.
Bah, humbug. Rant over.
ryanclassic.net
by Ryan Classic on Dec 2, 2009 3:14 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
That's a good question
It’s not like we forced him to accept a trade, which would explain why he would want revenge. The opposite happened…
by PeterR on Dec 2, 2009 8:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















