Silver Seven: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Has Kentucky Improved Since the Non-Conference Season?

Karlsson assigned to Binghamton: What's next for the rookie?

The Ottawa Senators assigned rookie defenceman Erik Karlsson, right, to the Binghamton Senators of the AHL on Tuesday

More photos » Sean Kilpatrick - AP

The Ottawa Senators assigned rookie defenceman Erik Karlsson, right, to the Binghamton Senators of the AHL on Tuesday

The Ottawa Senators just announced that rookie defenceman and 2008 first-round draft choice Erik Karlsson was sent to the Binghamton Senators of the AHL:

"The 19-year-old native of Landsbro, Sweden, made his National Hockey League debut on Oct. 3 in the Senators’ 5-2 loss to the New York Rangers and earned his first NHL point (an assist) in that contest. Karlsson has appeared in all nine Senators regular-season games to date, recording three assists and six penalty minutes."

Despite the writing on the wall for this decision, I'm still a little bit surprised. Karlsson wasn't the rookie sensation he was expected by some to be, but he still showed steady development over the course of just nine professional games in North America. He certainly hasn't been the worst of Ottawa's defencemen on many, if any, of the nights, and has actually played some steady minutes (averaging 17:25 per game).

The Senators, obviously, had three options: Keep Karlsson on his steep learning curve in the NHL, send him back to Sweden to play for Frolunda, and the option they decided to go with, assigned the young man to the AHL. There were reasons for and against any of them.

(Read a lot more about Ottawa's options, and what's likely expected of Karlsson in the AHL... )

Star-divide

In sending him to Binghamton, the Senators organization guarantees that Karlsson keeps learning the way the North American game is played: Smaller rink, bigger players, more physicality, and a faster game. But since it's a level down from the big-time, Karlsson may have the moment's reprieve in order to make the best decision he can with the puck in the defensive end, which has been his most significant issue, while also gaining confidence in his ability to take calculated risks on the offensive side of the puck. He won't likely be dominant in the AHL, but that split-second difference can mean the world to a player trying to learn the intricacies of the game. Plus, if his development really kicks up a notch, Karlsson is only a phone call away from re-joining the NHL squad.

Had he stayed in the NHL, the Senators would have been forced to live with any of the mistakes Karlsson made during the learning process, a potentially dangerous scenario for a team that's looked good so far, and is desperate to get back into the post-season. He would likely have been paired up with Filip Kuba,meaning that Ottawa's number one defenceman would have been as pre-occupied with backing up his partner as he would be in generating offence. Karlsson wouldn't have been an anchor, but he would have lessened the effectiveness of whoever he was partnered with. On the plus side, though, Karlsson would have had to sink or swim: Get used to the game, and quickly, or else.

Finally, were Karlsson sent back to Sweden, his salary would come off the books and the Senators would gain an extra year on his entry-level contract plus an extra year before he would become an unrestricted free agent. From the organization's perspective, though, getting him over to North America is likely priority number one for his development, and playing another year in Europe would have held back his development in a small-rink context.

What this decision may demonstrate, more than anything, is that Sens owner Eugene Melnyk is sick of paying NHL salaries to more players than he has to. Karlsson was one of only two defencemen on a two-way contract--surprising rookie Matt Carkner being the second--while there are six defencemen on one-way NHL contracts (plus half of now-waived Christoph Schubert's contract on the books). It's a justifiable concern for an owner whose pocketbook is undoubtedly feeling a hit from two springs of disappointing and non-existent playoff performances.

In Binghamton, Karlsson will likely quarterback the B-Sens' top powerplay unit, perhaps alongside Brian Lee. He'll play plenty of minutes, won't be as challenged by skaters as big or as fast as in the NHL, and may even grow into a player coach Don Nachbaur turns to when he needs a spark. Spectators in Binghamton should be able to expect a defenceman who makes simple, although not fancy, decisions defensively, but can open the ice right up with a brilliant pass.

For Ottawa fans, the relegation to the AHL is a mixed blessing: It means those in Ottawa won't get to see first-hand how Karlsson's development progresses, but it will be easy to find out exactly how he's doing thanks to pretty strong AHL coverage. It may be disappointing that Karlsson hasn't stepped in as the immediate impact player as some were hoping for, but many (myself included) had unrealistic expectations for the 19-year-old. In going to the AHL, playing more (and more meaningful) minutes in a league where he's got a good chance to put up decent numbers might be the best for his development at this point in his life.

That's the hope that Bryan Murray and Cory Clouston have, at any rate.

Poll
Should Karlsson have been assigned to the AHL?
Yes - it's the best choice for his development.
189 votes
No - he should have stayed in the NHL.
16 votes
No - he should have been sent back to Sweden.
1 votes

206 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 16 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I had a post written up but you posted before I did! Here's what I had to say:

Though Karlsson is understandably upset at this demotion, it’s the right move. The Ottawa Senators have Filip Kuba ready to return to the line-up, and there’s simply no room for Karlsson on the blueline this year. Though Karlsson was looking better by the end of his 9 games, he still had trouble handling the physical presence of many, if not most, forwards in the NHL. This would only have become more obvious as time went on, and would have been very damaging in a playoff push. Going to the AHL gives Erik a chance to further hone his already excellent offensive skills while adjusting to the North American game at a level he should be more comfortable with. Going to the AHL is far better for his development at this point of his career. There’s no doubt in my mind that he’ll come in next year and excel, but he simply was not ready at this point.

Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.

by DarrenM on Oct 27, 2009 5:04 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Here is something I am unclear of….

I was under the impression that only sending a player back to junior (CHL, College, or European leagues in Karlsson’s case) prevented you from using up one of their rookie-contract eligibility years. But, I believe I have read around here in recent days that you can prevent the rookie-contract from being implemented by sending a player down to the AHL. If the latter is true, then I think it was the right decision because of the impact that will have 3 years down the road. But keep in mind we won’t be able to call him up later in the season.

Otherwise, if he does in fact remain on his first rookie-contract year, I think he should stay with the big club because he has skills that other defencement do not.

by Buz Killington on Oct 27, 2009 10:10 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It has to do with the fact that he's a European underager playing in the AHL

North Americans who have played in the CHL aren’t able to play in the AHL at 19, but since Karlsson’s never played in the CHL, playing in Binghamton is the equivalent of “going back to junior” for him. It’s a bit of a funny rule, and from the sounds of it, Murray had to doublecheck on it before sending him down.

by BulletToothTony on Oct 27, 2009 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That’s my understanding of it as well.

by Mark Parisi on Oct 27, 2009 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

interesting, do know if its a new rule? spezza for example played 43 games for the bsens as a 19 year old.

by Buz Killington on Oct 28, 2009 1:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It might be a change made under the new CBA, but I’m not positive. The fact that so many people, Murray included, were unclear on it leads me to believe it’s fairly recent.

by PeterR on Oct 28, 2009 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

*our other defencemen that is

by Buz Killington on Oct 27, 2009 10:11 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

“He was caught off guard — he probably doesn’t read all the papers.”
-Bryan Murray, referring to Karlsson.

Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.

by DarrenM on Oct 28, 2009 11:50 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

He probably just reads Silver Seven. No need to read anything else, really, is there?

by PeterR on Oct 28, 2009 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know what pisses me off? Murray was all, “Karlsson is not going to be defined by his first 10 games.”

If the GM was telling everyone that I wouldn’t be demoted, I wouldn’t read the papers either. Why give him a vote of confidence if you’re just going to demote him? Silly.

by Mark Parisi on Oct 28, 2009 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's pretty weird

Is it just me, or does Murray fairly often say one thing and then do another? Not that I have a huge problem with it, but it makes me wonder about everything he says.

For instance, “Heatley won’t dictate this deal”, and all that crap.

I think there are reasons, though. If Karlsson thought he was playing for his job every night, I think it would have negatively impacted his play. It also looks like Murray hadn’t realized he could have saved the first year of that contract if Karlsson played in Binghamton, so factors may have changed between when he made that comment and when the demotion happened.

Maybe.

by PeterR on Oct 28, 2009 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I smell podcast fodder!

by Mark Parisi on Oct 28, 2009 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Between the demotion, the penalties and the week’s games, we have a TON to talk about.

by Mark Parisi on Oct 28, 2009 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.
Start posting about the Senators »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Modsuperstar-avatar_small
Could the Sens have traded for Giguere?
Marv_facebook_small
How great we are!!!
Small
Cowen Sucks
Small
Should he stay or should he go? I say he should go.
Small
Kid Karlsson
Sens_small
Alfredsson, Kuba to return tonight
Heatraitor_small
The Ottawa Senators Soundtrack!
Marv_facebook_small
Waiting for the big guns
Heatraitor_small
A Study in Senators' Fights
Small
Good news and what the Sens need

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Headshot_small PeterR

Darrennewyears_small DarrenM

Editors

Sens_small Mark Parisi